Fig. 12.—Two-seat vault privy
Click on image to view larger size.
As to the germicidal results obtained in chemical closets, few data are available. A disinfecting compound may not sterilize more than a thin surface layer of the solid matter deposited. Experiments by Dr. Alvah H. Doty with various agents recommended and widely used for the bedside sterilization of feces showed "that at the end of 20 hours of exposure to the disinfectant but one-eighth of an inch of the fecal mass was disinfected."[5] Plainly, then, to destroy all bacterial and parasitic life in chemical closets three things are necessary: (1) A very powerful agent; (2) permeation of the fecal mass by the agent; (3) retention of its strength and potency until permeation is complete. The compounds or mixtures commonly used in chemical closets are of two general kinds: First, those in which some coal-tar product or other oily disinfectant is used to destroy germs and deodorize, leaving the solids little changed in form; second, those of the caustic class that dissolve the solids, which, if of sufficient strength and permeating every portion, should destroy most if not all bacterial life. Not infrequently the chemical solution is intended to accomplish disinfection, deodorization, and reduction to a liquid or semiliquid state. Ordinary caustic soda, costing about $1 in 10-pound pails, has given good results.
[5] Annual Report, Mass. State Board of Health, 1914, p. 727.
A simple type of chemical closet is shown in [Figure 14], and the essential features are indicated in the notation. These closets with vent pipe and appurtenances, ready for setting up, retail for $20 and upward. A chemical tank closet, retailing for about $80 per seat, is shown in [Figure 15].
The Department of Agriculture occasionally receives complaints from people who have installed chemical closets, usually on the score of odors or the cost of chemicals.
Fig. 13.—Two-seat-vault privy. Note the shallow, water-tight, easily cleaned concrete vault
Click on image to view larger size.