B.—PAGE [19].
There is an apparent discrepancy among authors in regard to the intercalary day. While one asserts that it was between the 24th and 25th of February, another equally reliable, says that the 25th was the sexto calendas and the 24th was the bis-sexto calendas of the Julian calendar. Now it should be borne in mind that the Julian calendar is the basis of our own, and is identical with it in the number of months in the year, and in the number of days in the month. Also when the method of numbering the days from the beginning of the month was adopted, the intercalation was made to correspond with the intercalary day in the Julian calendar.
As in the Julian calendar there were twice the sixth day, so in the reformed calendar there were twice the 24th day, which was equivalent to 29 days in February. When the calendar was again corrected, making the 29th the intercalary day, then the 24th corresponded with the bis-sexto calendas of the Julian calendar. This reconciles the apparent discrepancy. While one author refers to the calendar in which the Julian rule of intercalation is adopted, another refers to the calendar when so corrected as to make the 29th of February the intercalary day. See following table:
| JULIAN METHOD OF INTERCALATION. | MODERN METHOD OF INTERCALATION. | ||||
| 1 | Cal. | Calendae | 1 | Cal. | Calendae |
| 2 | 4 | Quarto Nonas | 2 | 4 | Quarto Nonas |
| 3 | 3 | Tertio Nonas | 3 | 3 | Tertio Nonas |
| 4 | 2 | Pridie Nonas | 4 | 2 | Pridie Nonas |
| 5 | Nomes | Nonae | 5 | Nomes | Nonae |
| 6 | 8 | Octavo Idus | 6 | 8 | Octavo Idus |
| 7 | 7 | Septimo Idus | 7 | 7 | Septimo Ides |
| 8 | 6 | Sexto Idus | 8 | 6 | Sexto Idus |
| 9 | 5 | Quinto Idus | 9 | 5 | Quinto Idus |
| 10 | 4 | Quarto Idus | 10 | 4 | Quarto Idus |
| 11 | 3 | Tertio Idus | 11 | 3 | Tertio Idus |
| 12 | 2 | Pridie Idus | 12 | 2 | Pridie Idus |
| 13 | Ides | Idus | 13 | Ides | Idus |
| 14 | 16 | Sextodecimo Calendas | 14 | 16 | Sextodecimo Calendas |
| 15 | 15 | Quintodecimo Calendas | 15 | 15 | Quintodecimo Calendas |
| 16 | 14 | Quartodecimo Calendas | 16 | 14 | Quartodecimo Calendas |
| 17 | 13 | Tertiodecimo Calendas | 17 | 13 | Tertiodecimo Calendas |
| 18 | 12 | Duodecimo Calendas | 18 | 12 | Duodecimo Calendas |
| 19 | 11 | Undecimo Calendas | 19 | 11 | Undecimo Calendas |
| 20 | 10 | Decimo Calendas | 20 | 10 | Decimo Calendas |
| 21 | 9 | Nono Calendas | 21 | 9 | Nono Calendas |
| 22 | 8 | Octavo Calendas | 22 | 8 | Octavo Calendas |
| 23 | 7 | Septimo Calendas | 23 | 7 | Septimo Calendas |
| 24 | 6 | Bis-Sexto Calendas | 24 | 6 | Bis-sexto Calendas |
| 24 | 6 | Sexto Calendas | 25 | 6 | Sexto Calendas |
| 25 | 5 | Quinto Calendas | 26 | 5 | Quinto Calendas |
| 26 | 4 | Quarto Calendas | 27 | 4 | Quarto Calendas |
| 27 | 3 | Tertio Calendas | 28 | 3 | Tertio Calendas |
| 28 | 2 | Pridie Calendas | 29 | 2 | Pridie Calendas |
C.—PAGE [20].
The city where the great council was convened in 325 is not in France, as some have supposed, that being a more modern city of the same orthography, but pronounced Nees. The city which is so frequently referred to in this work is in Bythinia, one of the provinces of Asia Minor, situated about 54 miles southeast of Constantinople, of the same orthography as the former, but pronounced Ni´ce, and was so named by Lysimachus, a Greek general, about 300 years before Christ, in honor of his wife Nicea.