Our Calendar / The Julian calendar and its errors. How corrected by the Gregorian. Rules for finding the dominical letter, and the day of the week of any event from the days of Julius Caesar 46 B.C. to the year of our Lord four thousand; a new and easy method of fixing the date of Easter. Hebrew calendar; showing the correspondence in the date of events recorded in the Bible with our present Gregorian calendar. Illustrated by valuable tables and charts.

by George Nichols Packer

Also the Mahometan era, or the era of the Hegira, employed in Turkey, Persia and Arabia, which is dated from the flight of Mahomet from Mecca to Medina, which was Thursday night, the 15th of July, A. D., 622, and it commenced on Friday, the day following.

But there is a point from which all computation originally commenced, namely, the creation of man. Such an era is called the Mundane era. Now there are different Mundane eras—the common Mundane era 4,004 B. C., the Grecian Mundane era 5,598 B. C., and the Jewish Mundane era 3,761 B. C. All these commence computation from the same point, but differ in regard to the time which has elapsed since their computation commenced. God’s people used the Mundane era, until the Great Creator appeared among us, as one of us, in the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, to accomplish the great work of redemption; then His name was introduced as the turning point of the ages, the starting point of computation.

This was done by Dionysius Exiguus in the year of our Lord about 540, known at that time as the Dionysian, as well as the Christian era, and was first used in historical works by the venerable Bede early in the eighth century. “It was a great thought of the little monk (whether so called from his humility or littleness of stature is unknown), to view Christ as the turning point of the ages, and to introduce this view into chronology.”

All honor to him who introduced it, and to the nations which have approved, for thus honoring the Great Redeemer. Dionysius probably did not know, neither is it now known for a certainty the year of Christ’s birth, but it is evident, however, from the best authorities, that the era commenced at least five years too late, and probably more.

H.—PAGE [57].

It is recorded that, in the time of Numa, the vernal equinox fell on the 25th of March, and that Julius Cæsar restored it to the 25th, when he reformed the ancient Roman calendar in the year 46 B. C. It is also recorded that in less than 400 years from that time, at the meeting of the Council of Nice in 325, it had fallen back to the 21st—four days in less than 400 years.

Now there is an error somewhere, for it is found by actual computation that the discrepancy between the solar and the Julian year is about three days in 400 years. It certainly is true that the vernal equinox fell on the 21st in 325, and was restored to that place by Gregory in 1582; since which time it has been made to fall on the 21st by the Gregorian rule of intercalation. Again it is stated by the same author that the discrepancies in time from Cæsar to Gregory is thirteen days, from the Council of Nice to Gregory ten days; now 10 + 4 = 14. While our author states it is thirteen days, he also states it is fourteen days; a discrepancy of one day. The mistake evidently is in making the 25th instead of the 24th, the date of the vernal equinox in the time of Cæsar, consequently a difference of four days instead of three from Cæsar to the Council of Nice.

I.—PAGE [59].