CHAPTER II.
| The De Vulgari Eloquio: Its history and authentication | [417] |
| Its importance | [418] |
| And the scanty recognition thereof | [418] |
| Abstract of its contents: The “Vulgar Tongue” and “Grammar” | [419] |
| The nature, &c., of the gift of speech | [420] |
| Division of contemporary tongues | [421] |
| And of the subdivisions of Romance | [422] |
| The Italian Dialects: Some rejected at once | [423] |
| Others—Sicilian, Apulian, Tuscan, and Genoese | [424] |
| Venetian: Some good in Bolognese | [424] |
| The “Illustrious” Language none of these, but their common measure | [425] |
| Its four characteristics | [425] |
| The Second Book—Why Dante deals with poetry only | [426] |
| All good poetry should be in the Illustrious | [427] |
| The subjects of High Poetry—War, Love, Virtue | [427] |
| Its form: Canzoni | [427] |
| Definition of Poetry | [428] |
| Its styles, and the constituents of the grand style | [428] |
| Superbia Carminum | [428] |
| Constructionis elatio | [429] |
| Excellentia Verborum | [429] |
| Pexa et hirsuta | [430] |
| The Canzone | [430] |
| Importance of the book | [431] |
| Independence and novelty of its method | [432] |
| Dante’s attention to Form | [433] |
| His disregard of Oratory | [433] |
| The influence on him of Romance | [434] |
| And of comparative criticism | [434] |
| The poetical differentia according to him | [435] |
| His antidote to the Wordsworthian heresy | [436] |
| His handling of metre | [436] |
| Of diction | [437] |
| His standards of style | [438] |
| The “Chapter of the Sieve” | [439] |
| The pexa | [440] |
| The hirsuta | [441] |
| Other critical loci in Dante | [441] |
| The Epistle to Can Grande | [441] |
| The Convito | [442] |
| Dante on Translation | [443] |
| On language as shown in prose and verse | [443] |
| Final remarks on his criticism | [444] |
CHAPTER III.
THE FOURTEENTH AND FIFTEENTH CENTURIES.