[6] [De Vulgari Eloquio] references a note on p 40. The nearest mention is in the text of p. [38].
[7] John [Dennis] references a note p. 387, but should have been p. [278].
[8] [Donatus] references notes on p. 48 which do not seem pertinent.
[9]: Herr [Hamelius], refers to a note, apparently out of order, which should be p. [432], not p. 452.
[10] [Keble] mentions a note on p. 312, where he is not mentioned. The same note is referenced in the entry for Prælections Academicæ.
[11]: [La Casa] should refer to the text on p. [540], not to a note.
[12]: [Roman de la Rose] refers a non-existent note. It is mentioned at p. [110n], p. [281], and p. [334].
[13]: [Romeo and Juliet] has no references. The sole reference appears on p. [512].
[14]: Professor [Scott] refers to a note on p. 519. The note appears on p. [319].
[15]: [Syphilis] should refer to the text on p. [44], not to a note there.