CHAPTER IV.
DIDEROT AND THE FRENCH TRANSITION.
| The position of Diderot | [89] |
| Difficult to authenticate | [90] |
| But hardly to be exaggerated. His Impressionism | [91] |
| The Richardson éloge | [92] |
| The Reflections on Terence | [93] |
| The Review of the Lettres d’Amabed | [94] |
| The Examination of Seneca | [94] |
| The quality and eminence of his critical position | [95] |
| Rousseau revisited | [97] |
| Madame de Staël | [100] |
| Her critical position | [100] |
| And work | [100] |
| The Lettres sur Rousseau | [101] |
| The Essai sur les Fictions | [102] |
| The De La Littérature | [102] |
| The De l’Allemagne | [105] |
| Her critical achievement: imputed | [107] |
| And actual | [108] |
| Chateaubriand: his difficulties | [109] |
| His Criticism | [110] |
| Indirect | [111] |
| And Direct | [111] |
| The Génie du Christianisme | [112] |
| Its saturation with literary criticism | [113] |
| Survey and examples | [114] |
| Single points of excellence | [116] |
| And general importance | [117] |
| Joubert: his reputation | [118] |
| His literary αὐτάρκεια | [118] |
| The Law of Poetry | [119] |
| More on that subject | [119] |
| On Style | [120] |
| Miscellaneous Criticisms | [121] |
| His individual judgments more dubious | [122] |
| The reason for this | [123] |
| Additional illustrations | [123] |
| General remarks | [125] |
| The other “Empire Critics” | [126] |
| Fontanes | [127] |
| Geoffroy | [128] |
| Dussault | [129] |
| Hoffman, Garat, &c. | [129] |
| Ginguené | [130] |
| M. J. Chénier | [131] |
| Lemercier | [131] |
| Feletz | [132] |
| Cousin | [133] |
| Villemain | [133] |
| His claims | [133] |
| Deductions to be made from them | [134] |
| Beyle | [135] |
| Racine et Shakespeare | [136] |
| His attitude here | [138] |
| And elsewhere | [138] |
| Nodier | [139] |
CHAPTER V.
ÆSTHETICS AND THEIR INFLUENCE.
| The present chapter itself a kind of excursus | [141] |
| A parabasis on “philosophical” criticism | [141] |
| Modern Æsthetics: their fount in Descartes and its branches | [146] |
| In Germany: negative as well as positive inducements | [147] |
| Baumgarten | [148] |
| De Nonnullis ad Poema Pertinentibus | [148] |
| And its definition of poetry | [148] |
| The Aletheophilus | [149] |
| The Æsthetica | [149] |
| Sulzer | [150] |
| Eberhard | [151] |
| France: the Père André, his Essai sur le Beau | [151] |
| Italy: Vico | [152] |
| His literary places | [152] |
| The De Studiorum Ratione | [153] |
| The De Constantia Jurisprudentis | [153] |
| The first Scienza Nuova | [154] |
| The second | [154] |
| Rationale of all this | [155] |
| A very great man and thinker, but in pure Criticism an influence malign or null | [156] |
| England | [157] |
| Shaftesbury | [157] |
| Hume | [159] |
| Examples of his critical opinions | [160] |
| His inconsistency | [162] |
| Burke on the Sublime and Beautiful | [163] |
| The Scottish æsthetic-empirics: Alison | [164] |
| The Essay on Taste | [165] |
| Its confusions | [166] |
| And arbitrary absurdities | [167] |
| An interim conclusion on the æsthetic matter | [168] |
CHAPTER VI.
THE STUDY OF LITERATURE.