[1989] Ateius Capito, in Gell. x. 6; Livy, ep. xix; Val. Max. viii. 1. damn. 4; Suet. Tib. 2; Mommsen, Röm. Staatsr. ii. 492, n. 4. This, says Mommsen, is the only aedilician prosecution for a crime committed directly against the state in the period after the decemviral legislation. With this case compare Cicero’s threat mentioned in the text below.
[1990] Suet. Tib. 2.
[1991] Lange, Röm. Alt. ii. 586; Mommsen, Röm. Staatsr. ii. 496.
[1992] Cic. Rosc. Am. 12. 33; Val. Max. ix. 11. 2; Lange, ibid. iii. 134; Greenidge, Leg. Proced. 352.
Valerius Maximus, vi. 1. 8, refers to a prosecution (probably aedilician) of Cn. Sergius by Metellus Celer for stuprum, which seems to have occurred about this time; cf. Mommsen, Röm. Staatsr. ii. 493, n. 4.
[1993] Verr. i. 12. 36; v. 58. 151; 67. 173; 69. 178; 71. 183.
[1994] Cf. Lange, Röm. Alt. ii. 586.
[1995] Cic. Q. Fr. ii. 3; Sest. 44. 95; Vat. 17. 40; Ascon. 49; Dio Cass. xxxix. 18 ff.; Lange, Röm. Alt. ii. 586; Mommsen, Röm. Staatsr. ii. 493, n. 1; Greenidge, Leg. Proced. 341, 353.
On the aedilician jurisdiction in general, see especially Girard, Org. jud. d. Rom. 243 ff.
[1996] P. 269, 287.