[2026] Cic. Acad. Pr. ii. 5. 13; Val. Max. ibid.
[2027] Senec. 4. 11.
[2028] Cf. Lange, Röm. Alt. ii. 149.
[2029] Kubitschek, Röm. trib. or. 26 f.; Mommsen, Röm. Staatsr. iii. 176.
[2030] II. 21. 8. On this law in general, see further Ihne, Hist. of Rome, ii. 125-7; iv. 26 f.; Herzog, Röm. Staatsverf. i. 344 ff.; Long, Rom. Rep. i. 157 f.; Ferrero, Rome, i. 15.
[2031] Zon. viii. 20. 7; Plut. Marcell. 4; cf. Livy xxi. 63. 2.
[2032] Livy xlv. 35. 4.
[2033] Livy xxvi. 21.5. Next is mentioned the plebiscite of Ti. Sempronius, 167, for granting the imperium to three promagistrates; Livy xlv. 35-40; cf. xxxii. 7. 4; xxxviii. 47. 1; Plut. Aemil. 30 ff. The triumphs of Pompey, 80 and 71, must have been made possible by leges de eius imperio, though none are mentioned; Plut. Pomp. 14, 21; Cic. Imp. Pomp. 21. 61 f. The lex Cornelia, 80, which permitted Pompey to bring his army home from Africa, was essential to the triumph but was not the law which granted the imperium; Sall. Hist. ii. 21; Gell. x. 20. 10; Plut. Pomp. 13; Lange, Röm. Alt. ii. 678. The law for the triumph over Juba was passed for Caesar in 48 in advance of his victory; Dio Cass. xliii. 14. 3. There must have been many other such plebiscites not mentioned by the sources. Magistrates had no more right than promagistrates without especial authorization to command troops within the city limits, though the triumph on the Alban Mount continued to be permissible without an act either of the senate or of the comitia; p. 293.
[2034] P. 307.
[2035] Polyb. vi. 16. 3.