[2294] Plut. C. Gracch. 4; Diod. xxxv. 25, 2; Fest. ep. 23 (abacti); Lange, Röm. Alt. i. 655; iii. 30 f.; Greenidge, Hist. of Rome, i. 202.
[2295] P. 368.
[2296] P. 255 f. For the comitial interdict against Popillius, see p. 256.
[2297] Cf. Greenidge, Hist. of Rome, i. 204 f.; Fowler, Eng. Hist. Rev. xx. 224.
[2298] Humbert, in Daremberg et Saglio, Dict. ii. 1346. For examples, see Marquardt, Röm. Staatsv. ii. 114, and especially, Oliver, Roman Economic Conditions, 61 ff.
[2299] Livy, ep. lx; App. B. C. i. 21. 89; Schol. Bob. 303; Vell. ii. 6. 3; Plut. C. Gracch. 5.
[2300] App. ibid. § 90; Diod. xxxv. 25; Cic. Sest. 48. 103.
[2301] Cic. Off. ii. 21. 72; Tusc. iii. 20. 48; Diod. ibid; Oros. v. 12. 4; cf. Long, Rom. Rep. i. 261-3; Greenidge, Hist. of Rome, i. 203-7.
[2302] The view here offered was suggested in Botsford, History of Rome (1901), 156. It is presented in greater detail by Fowler, in Eng. Hist. Rev. xx (1905). 221 ff.
[2303] Begun by his lex de provocatione; p. 371.