[2595] Cic. Fam. iii. 6. 3, 6.
[2596] Cic. Fam. iii. 10. 6; Q. Fr. i. 1. 9, 26.
[2597] App. B. C. i. 103. 482; Oros. v. 22. 4; Eutrop. v. 9. Willems, Sén. Rom. i. 404, calculates that the number was reduced to about a hundred and fifty.
[2598] Livy, ep. lxxxix; cf. Cic. Rosc. Am. 3. 8; Dion. Hal. v. 77. 5; Sall. Cat. 37.
[2599] B. C. i. 100. 468.
[2600] Cf. Fröhlich, in Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encycl. iv. 1559.
[2601] P. 402. The second view, which seems more reasonable, is held by Lange, Röm. Alt. iii. 156.
[2602] No authority gives this number, which however may be deduced from well-known facts; Willems, Sén. Rom. i. 405 f.
[2603] Willems, ibid. 406 f.
[2604] Fröhlich, in Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encycl. iv. 1560.