[2919] Ibid. v. 7. 21; vii. 6. 17.
[2920] Ibid. ii. 38. 99; v. 12. 33; Alt. xv. 19. 2.
[2921] Cic. Phil. v. 3; vi. 5. 14; xi. 6. 13.
[2922] Dio Cass. xliv. 53. 7; cf. Livy, ep. cxvii; Vell. ii. 63. 1; cf. p. 341, 391. No comitial act is suggested, and it may have been one of the false laws of Caesar. Ferrero’s theory (Rome, iii. 38) has nothing in its favor.
[2923] P. 455.
[2924] Cic. Phil. i. 8. 19; v. 5 f.; viii. 9. 27; cf. Greenidge, Leg. Proced. 449 f. This law with his others was annulled in the following year by the senate; Cic. xiii. 3. 5; p. 457, n. 7.
[2925] Cic. Phil. i. 9. 21 f.
[2926] Ibid.
[2927] Cic. Phil. v. 4. 10; p. 457, n. 7. The lex Antonia on the dictatorship was doubtless renewed by a lex Vibia; Cic. l. c.
[2928] Dio Cass. xlvi. 55. 3.