Lign. 231. Rhynchosaurus articeps. New Red Sandstone; near Shrewsbury
Fig. 1.—Lateral view of the cranium and lower jaw: 1/2 nat size.

Cranium.

a, a.Intermaxillary bones.
b.Nasal.
c.Frontal.
d.Maxillary.
e.Anterior frontal.
f.Lachrymal.
g.Malar.
h.Posterior frontal.
i.Orbital division of posterior frontal.
k.Temporal.
l.Tympanic.

Lower Jaw.

m.Dentary.
n.Coronoid.
o.Articular.
p.Angular.
q.Opercular or splenial.
r.The orbit.

Fig. 2.—The upper aspect of a dorsal vertebra: nat. size.

There are no teeth apparent in either jaw: the margin of the upper maxillary has feeble dentations, but in the lower jaw even these indications are wanting, and it is probable that this reptile had its jaws encased by a bony or horny sheath, as in birds and turtles.[664] (Owen.)

[664] Rep. Brit. Assoc. 1841, p. 150. See also Camb. Phil. Trans, vol. vii. p. 357, tab. 5, 6.

Thecodontosaurus and Palæosaurus. Ly. p. 306, figs. 348, 349.—Numerous bones and teeth of reptiles occur in the Magnesian Conglomerate, near Bristol, and have been described by Dr. Riley and Mr. Stutchbury in an interesting memoir to which reference should be made for details (Geol. Trans. 2d ser. vol. v. p. 349, pl. xxix. xxx.). The bones denote an approach to the lizards; the teeth are implanted in sockets; these reptiles, therefore, belonged to the group termed thecodont, and the name Thecodontosaurus, given to these extinct Saurians by Dr. Riley, has reference to this character. The teeth are pointed, compressed laterally, slightly convex on each side, with a trenchant, finely serrated edge in front and behind; the fang is sub-cylindrical. Other teeth from the same deposit, possessing the same general characters, but distinguished by peculiarities of form, have been referred to another genus, named Palæosaurus. The vertebræ found associated with the teeth and jaws are biconcave, and are remarkably characterized by the great depth of the spinal canal in the middle of the centrum or body of the vertebræ, so that the spinal chord must have presented a moniliform or bead-like appearance. These reptiles, in their thecodont type of dentition, biconcave vertebræ, double-headed ribs, and proportionate size of the bones of the extremities, are nearly allied to the Teleosaurus, (see ante, [p. 679]); but they combine a lacertian form of tooth, and a lacertian structure of the pectoral, and probably of the pelvic arches, with these crocodilian characters; they have also distinctive modifications: such, for example, as the moniliform spinal chord.[665]

[665] Owen; Rep. Brit. Assoc. 1841, p. 155, &c.

Dicynodon. Ligns. [232], [233], [234].—This singular fossil reptile was discovered, by Mr. Bain, in South Africa. It is distinguished, by some remarkable peculiarities of structure, from other animals of the Saurian order; of which it represents a new tribe, or sub-order. The cranium is narrow; the nostrils are divided, as in Lizards, and not confluent, as in Chelonia; the skull, in other respects, much resembles in general appearance that of a Turtle; the orbits are large; the jaws are edentulous, as in the Turtles, with the exception of a pair of long tusks,[666] implanted in sockets in the upper maxillary bone, like those of the Walrus; these tusks are of a finer texture than that of the Crocodile’s teeth, and almost as dense as in the Hyæna. These creatures present in the most striking manner that blending of the peculiarities of several existing orders, which is continually presented to the palæontologist; for with a type essentially lacertian are combined crocodilian and chelonian modifications. Although no vestiges of these reptiles have been discovered in England or in Europe, yet the occurrence of an allied form, the Rhynchosaurus ([Lign. 231]), in our New Red Sandstone, and the probability that the South African reptiliferous deposits may, from their position, belong to the Triassic Epoch, induce me to give a somewhat extended notice of these extraordinary fossils: and I am led to do so on another account, namely, because the memoir,[667] of which the following is a brief abstract, is so excellent an example of the manner in which such investigations should be conducted, so as to arrive at any satisfactory conclusions as to the characters and relations of the lost types of beings, whose fragmentary and petrified relics are the only vestiges that remain.