Race Distinctions in American Law

by Gilbert Thomas Stephenson

[560]. Anderson v. L. & N. Ry. Co., 1894, 62 Fed. 46.

[561]. O. Val. Ry. Rec. v. Lander, 1898, 47 S. W. 344.

[562]. Smith v. State, 1898, 46 S. W. 566.

[563]. Chiles v. C. & O. Ry., 1907, 101 S. W. 386.

[564]. Pullman-Palace Car Co. v. Cain, 1897, 40 S. W. 220.

[565]. Smith v. Chamberlain, 1893, 17 S. E. 391.

[566]. C. & O. Ry. Co. v. Com. of Ky., 1905, 84 S. W. 566.

[567]. L. & N. Ry. Co. v. Catron, 1897, 43 S. W. 443.

[568]. West Chester and Phila. Ry. Co. v. Mills, 1867, 52 Pa. S. 209; U. S. v. Dodge, 1877, Fed. Case No. 14,976; Murphy v. W. & A. Ry. Co., 1885, 23 Fed. 637; Logwood v. M. & C. Ry. Co., 1885, 23 Fed. 318; Houck v. S. Pac. Ry. Co., 1888, 38 Fed. 226; Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896, 163 U. S. 537.

[569]. Logwood v. M. & C. Ry. Co., 1885, 23 Fed. 318.