I. While our Academy was congratulating itself on the progress made by the doctrine of animal electricity, its exultation was in some measure checked by an objection brought against it, which did not attack any one part of it, but the whole theory. If the contractions in animal bodies, said its opponents, are produced merely by the electricity of metals, how degraded is that electricity which at first was supposed
to reside in animal bodies, since it is now found to be subservient to the electricity borrowed from metals! I heard repeated objections of this kind while labouring under a severe indisposition; but being restored to health by the skill and attention of Galvani, I took the earliest opportunity to inquire after the success of his animal electricity, and at the same time promised him every assistance in my power in the prosecution of his researches, for which I always entertained a great fondness. He accepted my offer; and as I had now recovered my former strength and vigour, I was anxiously desirous to defend the cause of animal electricity, attacked and almost exploded, amidst a variety of contradictory opinions, and with this view to undertake a new series of experiments.
II. The theory of animal electricity had scarcely been proposed, when a suspicion was entertained that it might be produced by some external agent excited by the arming or by the arc. This suspicion Galvani endeavoured to obviate in various ways. By using an insulated arc, it was impossible that the person who performed the experiment could communicate any of his electricity to the animals. In preparing the frogs he employed no conducting bodies; he neither touched them with his fingers nor with a knife; he uncovered the muscles and nerves with idio-electric bodies, and still the usual contractions took place. Nay, Galvani carried his attention so far as to exclude even the air. Having immersed a frog with an insulated arc in a glass vessel filled with oil, and having made a communication by means of an
arc between the muscles and nerves, muscular contractions were immediately produced. This electricity, the animal being thus surrounded by idio-electric bodies, could not certainly be furnished by the atmosphere, from which it was entirely separated. While engaged in these experiments, the celebrated Spallanzani stopped a few days at Bologna on his way to Pavia, and during a short conversation which he had with Galvani on his new system, expressed some suspicion that the electricity observed in animals might be acquired from external bodies. After some discussion however on this subject, Spallanzani acknowledged that the experiment made on the frog immersed in oil was so conclusive, that nothing could be better calculated to satisfy all his doubts. I mention this circumstance, because the approbation of so eminent a man was of the utmost importance to the cause of the theory of animal electricity.
III. Having proposed the before-mentioned series of experiments, I was led into various reflections on this subject. As the same electricity exercises an extensive action in the different parts of animals—some becoming electric through an excess, and others through a deficiency of it—I could not comprehend why there should not be an electrical movement even when the end of a very long arc was covered by a non-conducting body; and why the same arc touched by the same person, in the same atmosphere, should sometimes become charged with a very small quantity of electricity, only capable of exciting motion in the legs of a frog, and sometimes
with a large quantity sufficient to produce contractions in the leg of a lamb or a calf. This circumstance appeared to me to be involved in a considerable degree of obscurity. I conjectured also that internal electricity might have been implanted in animal bodies for the purpose of defending the animal œconomy, and protecting it against any injury which it might sustain from an excess of the external atmospheric electricity. Were not this the case, there might be reason to apprehend that the electricity of the clouds, in the time of storms, might attack the human body and destroy it.
IV. But though the suspicion of electricity being communicated from the air, or from the person who performed the experiment, was lessened or removed, there were still some who thought that the objection in regard to metals could not be obviated in the same manner. The idea generally entertained, that all the contractions ascribed to animal electricity were to be ascribed only to external electricity, proceeding from the armatures, and not to any electric virtue in the animals, seemed to be strengthened. Carradori, who had made this objection, afterwards altered his opinion, and became a strenuous advocate for animal electricity; but the celebrated Volta still entertained great doubts. These he communicated to me in a long letter, and they were afterwards published in the Pavian Journals. All his doubts were founded on this circumstance: heterogeneous metals are required to produce contractions; one of which becomes charged positively and the other negatively; and it is only
in the act of restoring an equilibrium between them that muscular contractions are excited.
V. This simple and ingenious idea was no doubt highly captivating; but the experiments made by Galvani and by myself prevented me from adopting it entirely; for it is evident from Galvani’s Dissertation, and from my own observations, that if the muscles and nerves of a frog be immersed in two vessels filled with water, contractions will be produced on the application of a metallic arc. Here then we have muscular contractions with one arc and with one metal. Living frogs subjected to the action of rarefied or of condensed air, and afterwards dissected in the usual manner, exhibit contractions without any armature, and merely by a silver arc applied to the muscles and nerves; and this is always the case, whether the frogs be large and strong, or small and weak. While engaged with these experiments, Galvani informed our academy that he had obtained contractions in large and vigorous frogs, which had been recently dissected, without the help of the air pump and without armatures, merely by the application of an arc. The same thing occurred to Carradori, who, though he at first entertained doubts on this subject, was afterwards convinced of the truth of the phænomenon. It still however appeared to me, notwithstanding the results obtained by Galvani and Carradori, that the animal electricity of frogs was excited in more abundance by the action of the air pump, even without the application of armatures.
VI. But that the series of experiments I had undertaken might be better calculated to establish the theory of animal electricity, and as it was difficult to find any of the solid metals homogeneous throughout, I had recourse to mercury, which, by the help of chemistry, may be brought to a very considerable degree of purity. For the greater convenience in the employment of this substance, I invented the following apparatus:—Two glass vessels are so arranged (Plate IV. fig. 1.) that the one stands above the other: the upper one is filled with mercury, and the spinal marrow of a prepared frog is placed in it; and by means of a hole in the bottom of it, which may be opened at pleasure, the mercury can be made to fall on any part of the muscles of the same animal placed in the lower vessel. The stream of mercury occasions convulsive movements to take place in the muscles; and yet in this case the mercury forms both the armature and the arc: consequently the electricity in both is the same, and can exercise no action. When contractions therefore take place, they cannot be ascribed to the electricity of the metal. Should it be said that the mercury as it runs down may excite electricity from the sides of the glass vessel, as is the case with the mercury in the upper part of a barometer, which, when in the least agitated, shines with an electric light, any doubt on this subject may be easily removed by substituting vessels of wood instead of those of glass.