XII. Such bodies as had hitherto been put into the air pump were gradually subjected to the action of a vacuum. Hence it appeared that the apparatus above described might be attended with a considerable degree of utility; as in future, any body whatever, whether solid or fluid, might be subjected to this action at once. For, the lower part of the receiver being deprived of its internal air, if the bladder be burst by means of the glass rod, the fluid will run down and occupy the space emptied of air, leaving a vacuum in the upper part. When the fluid has thus fallen to the lower part of the receiver, solid bodies even, if any were immersed in it while in the upper part of the receiver, will also experience the action of the vacuum. But liquid bodies are of such a nature, that they have united with them certain aëriform fluids, which, when the pressure of the air is removed, readily expand. A fluid, therefore, when it has fallen to the lower part of the receiver, being agitated and thrown into a state of perturbation by the motion, its most subtle principles will be extricated, and fill the capacity of the bell. The vacuum will then be disturbed by the evaporation,
which, acting on the mercury in the barometer connected with the air pump, will cause it to fall. But every one acquainted with the principles of philosophy must know, that the depression of the mercury in the barometer will be greater, according as a greater quantity of aëriform fluids has been disengaged in the receiver; and if the degree of pressure in the barometer varies according to the variety of aëriform principles, it may be readily seen, that this method may be employed to determine the quantity of them, or their elasticity, since they are cut off from all communication with the surrounding atmosphere, though it still exercises its pressure upon them.
XIII. The vacuum here obtained in the upper part of the bell, seems to be far superior to that produced in the lower part, according to the usual method. For it has long been a complaint among philosophers, that by working the air pump the air is only rarefied, till it no longer possesses elasticity capable of raising the valve, so that it is impossible to produce a complete vacuum by this method. If we can credit the followers of Euler, that subtle fluid, which they call ether, and which permeates every thing, still remains; for, adopting the opinion of the antient Peripatetics, they consider a vacuum as beneath the dignity of nature. But, setting aside this question, I shall only observe, that if a vacuum be formed in the upper part of the receiver, by the method above described, it does not appear that it can be disturbed by any thing from without, and the gravity of the falling
fluid will not suffer itself to be overcome by the subtle ether, if any really exists. Should it be apprehended that the air contained in the oil may be disengaged, and disturb the vacuum, you may substitute in its stead mercury or water, which can be deprived of air either by boiling or by long exposure to the action of a vacuum. But before any thing certain on this subject can be said, new and repeated experiments will be necessary. As every objection that could be made in regard to a vacuum seems now to be obviated, since a space perfectly free from common air can be produced, and cut off from all communication with the atmosphere, or with conducting bodies, I shall return to animal electricity, from which I was led by a desire of contributing towards the improvement of natural philosophy in general.
XIV. Those who attempt to determine the velocity of the nervous fluid in a given time, undertake a matter of great difficulty, respecting which nothing certain can be known. Haller rejected the suppositions of those who, comparing the tenuity of the nervous tubes of the heart with the large branch of the aorta, were of opinion, that the velocity of the nervous fluid must be two thousand eight hundred and eighty times greater than that of the blood. This celebrated physician, distrusting hypothesis, had recourse to experiment, and found that the velocity of the nervous fluid would be no less than nine thousand feet in the first minute. But in this determination of the velocity of the nervous fluid
there seems to be some difficulty, which perhaps ought to be ascribed rather to the period when that celebrated man lived, than to his want of sagacity or accuracy. Had Haller possessed the means of conveying the nervous fluid with his own hands to different parts at pleasure, he would no doubt have given us some more certain ideas respecting its rapid motion. I resolved, therefore, not to neglect those advantages with which the modern philosophy has been enriched, and to employ very long metallic arcs, by which I could direct the animal electricity as I pleased. A staircase which reached from the top to the bottom of the house, with many windings, presented me with an iron plate, exceedingly convenient for the transmission of animal electricity. A metal wire, brought down from the top of the staircase, was connected with the iron plate, and by these means I obtained an arc, the length of which was above one hundred and fifty feet. When this arrangement was made, the two extremities of this very long arc were applied to the armed nerves and muscles of a frog; and the animal electricity being thus excited, instantly proceeded with so much velocity from the one extremity of the arc to the other, that no difference could be perceived between the time when the frog touched the arc, and that when it began to be agitated. But to show that this result was not owing entirely to the metallic conductor, I employed long ropes dipped in salt water, and always with the same effect. This circumstance seems to prove, in a striking manner, a great similarity between the nervous fluid and common electricity, and to overturn the
opinion of Haller, who, according to his calculations, makes the nervous fluid require a second for passing over the space of 150 feet.
XV. According to Beccaria, a celebrated observer of the propagation of the electric fluid, there are two ways of its being transmitted; one when it flows through conducting bodies only, and the other when, being collected in non-conducting bodies, it proceeds from the coating electric by excess to that which is in the contrary state. In the one case, Beccaria establishes a certain time for its passage; in the other he allows none. This celebrated man observed, that the electric matter was conveyed from the conductor of a machine, along a metallic wire 500 feet in length, in the course of a second; in its passage along a hempen rope of the same length, it employed seven seconds; but when the rope was moistened with water, it required only two or nearly three vibrations of a pendulum. When he discharged a Leyden flask by the longest conductor, he was never able to observe the least interval of time. The same thing was remarked by Jallabert, Sigaud de la Fond, and other philosophers, who performed their experiments, not in an apartment but in the open air; and conveyed the electric fluid in this manner for a considerable distance along the banks of large rivers. Monnier extended two iron wires[11] in an open field, parallel to each other, for the distance of 5107 feet; and a man placed between them held in
his hands the extremity of the conductors, keeping them at a little distance from his body. “But the man, who was in the middle of the arc,” says the author, “while he saw the spark issue from the jar, received the shock: he could have distinguished the smallest interval of time between the explosion and the shock; and if it had amounted to the fourth part of a second, it could have easily been remarked.”
XVI. While reflecting on these facts, I formed a conjecture from the great celerity with which animal electricity is conveyed, respecting the manner in which it is evolved. If the animal electricity were conveyed from a muscle to a nerve, or vice versa, in the same manner as the common electric fluid is conveyed from the machine by the chain, it would have been observed to employ some time, however small, in its passage. As I at first ascribed this to the shortness of the conductor I had used, I extended it to more than 250 Parisian feet, and applied the nerves and muscles of a frog to this new conductor in the manner above described, without observing the least obstacle to the passage of the electric fluid. As this arc formed a half of that employed by Beccaria, the space of half a second would have been required, if we consider in this passage only one kind of electricity. But the half second required according to the observations of Beccaria was not observed: it therefore appears, that this propagation of animal electricity ought not to be referred to the first-mentioned case, but to that where equilibrium is restored between the negative and positive state.