[19] See Heidelberger Jahrbücher, 1868, p. 449.
[20] Ruling out Simonides, of course, as not clearly belonging to the cycle.
[21] Siberian, it will be remembered, is of the same type as Tobit.
[22] See Hertz, pp. 151–155.
[23] For examples, see Hertz, pp. 106–115.
[24] It is not clear whether she was actually divided in the primitive forms, or merely threatened. In either case the union would take place as stated.
[25] Armenian and Siberian give adequate evidence as to the truth of the latter statement, though more Asiatic variants of this type are to be desired.
[26] Servian III., Esthonian II., and Rumanian I.
[27] See p. 82.
[28] See pp. 116 f.