| G. A. |
Hind Head, March 1894.
CONTENTS
| PAGE | ||
| I. | THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AMONG LANGUAGES | [1] |
| II. | IN THE MATTER OF ARISTOCRACY | [9] |
| III. | SCIENCE IN EDUCATION | [18] |
| IV. | THE THEORY OF SCAPEGOATS | [27] |
| V. | AMERICAN DUCHESSES | [35] |
| VI. | IS ENGLAND PLAYED OUT? | [44] |
| VII. | THE GAME AND THE RULES | [53] |
| VIII. | THE RÔLE OF PROPHET | [61] |
| IX. | THE ROMANCE OF THE CLASH OF RACES | [70] |
| X. | THE MONOPOLIST INSTINCTS | [79] |
| XI. | "MERE AMATEURS" | [87] |
| XII. | A SQUALID VILLAGE | [95] |
| XIII. | CONCERNING ZEITGEIST | [104] |
| XIV. | THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE | [112] |
| XV. | EYE versus EAR | [122] |
| XVI. | THE POLITICAL PUPA | [130] |
| XVII. | ON THE CASINO TERRACE | [138] |
| XVIII. | THE CELTIC FRINGE | [147] |
| XIX. | IMAGINATION AND RADICALS | [156] |
| XX. | ABOUT ABROAD | [165] |
| XXI. | WHY ENGLAND IS BEAUTIFUL | [173] |
| XXII. | ANENT ART PRODUCTION | [182] |
| XXIII. | A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA | [190] |
| XXIV. | OF SECOND CHAMBERS | [199] |
| XXV. | A POINT OF CRITICISM | [207] |
POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY
I.
THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AMONG LANGUAGES.
A distinguished Positivist friend of mine, who is in most matters a practical man of the world, astonished me greatly the other day at Venice, by the grave remark that Italian was destined to be the language of the future. I found on inquiry he had inherited the notion direct from Auguste Comte, who justified it on the purely sentimental and unpractical ground that the tongue of Dante had never yet been associated with any great national defeat or disgrace. The idea surprised me not a little; because it displays such a profound misconception of what language is, and why people use it. The speech of the world will not be decided on mere grounds of sentiment: the tongue that survives will not survive because it is so admirably adapted for the manufacture of rhymes or epigrams. Stern need compels. Frenchmen and Germans, in congress assembled, and looking about them for a means of intercommunication, might indeed agree to accept Italian then and there as an international compromise. But congresses don't make or unmake the habits of everyday life; and the growth or spread of a language is a thing as much beyond our deliberate human control as the rise or fall of the barometer.