| Births. | Males. | Females. | Deaths. | |||||
| Illegitimate. | Legitimate. | Total. | Males. | Females. | Total. | |||
| San José | 179 | 428 | 607 | } | 247 | 209 | 456 | |
| Alajuela | 82 | 290 | 372 | } | 117 | 115 | 232 | |
| Cartago | 63 | 357 | 420 | } | 133 | 117 | 250 | |
| Heredia | 13 | 76 | 89 | } 825 | 795 | 85 | 92 | 177 |
| Liberia | 34 | 13 | 47 | } | 13 | 14 | 27 | |
| Puntarenas | 35 | 15 | 50 | } | 44 | 35 | 79 | |
| Limon | 28 | 7 | 35 | } | 38 | 24 | 62 | |
| Total | 434 | 1,186 | 1,620 | 825 | 795 | 677 | 606 | 1,283 |
Deaths by Ages.
| From 1 to 5 years | 709 |
| From 6 to 20 years | 65 |
| From 21 to 50 years | 317 |
| From 51 and upward | 192 |
| Total | 1283 |
These data show in favor of births over deaths an increase of 337, of whom 148 were males and 189 females.
The causes of death in each 1000 cases were as follows:
| Fever | 220 | Heart failure | 31 |
| Cholera infantum | 112 | Apoplexy and paralysis | 81 |
| Diarrhea | 52 | Indigestion | 12 |
| Dysentery and colic | 77 | Gastro-enteritis | 15 |
| Typhoid fever | 26 | Enteritis | 28 |
| Bronchitis and pneumonia | 91 | Inflammation | 35 |
| Phthisis | 42 | Cancer | 16 |
| Influenza | 17 | Blood-poison | 17 |
| Dropsy | 31 | Syphilis | 5 |
In regard to social conditions, the population of Costa Rica was distributed in 1892, by percentages, as follows:
| Province or Comarca. | Married. | Divorced. | Widowers. | Widows. | Single Male. | Single Female. |
| San José | 27.52 | 0.38 | 0.89 | 2.98 | 33.77 | 34.46 |
| Alajuela | 28.71 | 0.11 | 0.87 | 3.17 | 34.16 | 32.98 |
| Cartago | 26.76 | 0.08 | 1.16 | 3.98 | 34.82 | 33.20 |
| Heredia | 28.33 | 0.07 | 1.06 | 3.22 | 32.94 | 34.38 |
| Guanacaste | 22.82 | 0.64 | 1.60 | 3.59 | 37.53 | 33.82 |
| Puntarenas | 18.17 | 0.30 | 1.17 | 3.51 | 40.07 | 36.78 |
| Limon | 5.05 | 0.16 | 0.39 | 0.70 | 69.18 | 24.52 |
With respect to instruction there were 28,208 individuals who could read, and 48,215 persons who could read and write, leaving 166,782 illiterates, or 68.58 per cent of the entire population who could not read or write.
It will be interesting for the economist to know the percentage of the population capable of reading, or writing and reading. It is as follows: