Never hostile to each other, they had suffered from a mutual lack of understanding in the past.
Now there was to be an entente cordiale that promised great things.
One important fact had contributed to this rapprochement. The earnest Christian workers and ardent sociologists were now all coming to realise that Inebriety is a disease and not, specifically, a vice. The doctors had known this, had been preaching this for years. But the time had arrived when religious workers in the same cause were beginning to find that they could with safety join hands with those who (as they had come to see) knew and could define the springs of action which made people intemperate.
The will of the intemperate individual was weakened by a disease. The doctors had shown and proved this beyond possibility of doubt.
It was a disease. Its various causes were discovered and put upon record. Its pathology was as clearly stated as a proposition in Euclid. Its psychology was, at last, beginning to be understood.
And it was on the basis of psychology that the two parties were meeting.
Science could take a drunkard—though really only with the drunkard's personal connivance and earnest wish to reform—and in a surprisingly short time, varying with individual cases, restore him to the world sane, and in health.
But as far as individual cases went, science professed itself able to do little more than this. It could give a man back his health of mind and body, it could—thus—enable him to recall his soul from the red hells where it had strayed. But it could not enable the man to retain the gifts.
Religion stepped in here. Christianity and those who professed it said that faith in Christ, and that only, could preserve the will; that, to put it shortly, a personal love of Jesus, a heart that opened itself to the mysterious operations of the Holy Spirit would be immune from the disease for ever more.
Christian workers proved their contention by statistics as clear and unmistakable as any other.