[2763]. C.I.L. xv. 6631, 6900 ff.; Ann. dell’ Inst. 1880, p. 315.
[2764]. B.M. 25-26; C.I.L. xv. part 2, plate, No. 2; Daremberg and Saglio, s.v. Lucerna, p. 1323.
[2765]. Cf. Mus. Alaoui, pl. 34, p. 149, Nos. 17-8: see also B.M. 69-82.
[2766]. See Dressel in C.I.L. xv. p. 782 ff.; Toutain in Daremberg and Saglio, art. Lucerna; Fink, Formen u. Stempel röm. Thonlampen, in Sitzungsberichte d. Münchener Akad. 1900, p. 685 ff.
[2767]. On the evidence yielded by the potters’ signatures see also below, p. 428.
[2768]. See the examples given on Plates LXIV.-LXV.
[2769]. I am inclined to agree with Dr. Dressel in placing this type earlier than Fink’s Class I. It seems to be intermediate in form between the delphiniform and other types with blunt nozzles, and the type given in Fig. [204]. Cf. C.I.L. xv. pl. 3.
[2770]. Cf. C.I.L. xv. pl. 2, No. 5 = Fig. 206, and Dressel, ad loc., p. 783.
[2771]. Cf. C.I.L. v. 8114.
[2772]. See Daremberg and Saglio, s.v. p. 1011, fig. 4381.