[36: Idem.]
[37: The Immanuel, 2 Rob. Adm. Rep. 198.]
[38: Park, 502; Sewell v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co. 4 Taunt. 856; Wilson v. Marryat, 8 T. Rep. 31.]
[39: Willison v. Patterson, 7 Taunt. 439; Vide Note on the War Bill Act, at the end of this part.]
[40: Per Gibbs, C.J. Antoine v. Morshead, 6 Taunt. 238. According to Mr. Serjeant Byles, a bill drawn by a British prisoner in favour of an alien enemy cannot be enforced by the payee. He cites no case in support of this assertion; but on the principle of the last case cited, if it were drawn for subsistence and not for trade, there seems to be no reason why it should not be legal.]
[41: Duhamel v. Pickering, 2 Starkie, 92.]
[42: Barker v. Hodgson, 3 M. & S. 270.]
[43: Liddard v. Lopes, 10 East. 526; Abbot, on Shipping, 596.]
[44: 1 Kent's Com. 248; The Hiram, 3 Rob. Adm. 189.]
[45: 1 Kent's Com., 249.]