A list of numbers and kinds of birds killed is given in Table 1. Discussion of data afforded by certain species for which, large samples were available will be found below. There are additionally certain data afforded by the sample and certain comments to be made on various species which can be handled most conveniently in an annotated list. In this list we have included all weight data (still scarce for many North American birds), comments on status in Kansas of various species, results of comparisons to determine subspecies, and miscellaneous observations. Weights of birds are given in grams and were taken on a triple-beam balance. Fat condition is given in the scale proposed by McCabe (1943:556). Weight data from birds migrating at night should be especially useful because these migrants all have relatively empty crops and stomachs, thus reducing variability. Not all birds were suitable for weighing and measuring, for a variety of reasons. This accounts for discrepancies in totals between Table 1 and the annotated list.

All passerine species were aged by noting the degree of ossification of the skull. In no case, of the more than a thousand passerines aged by examination of the skull, did we find difficulty in determining whether an individual was a bird of the year or an adult. We found no specimens in which ossification of the skull was nearing completion. In the several species in our sample with distinctive first-winter plumages, we found complete agreement in age as shown by plumage and by condition of the skull. We think this is further proof, if such is needed, that this method of aging is thoroughly reliable in early autumn for the passerine species included in our sample and for others with similar breeding seasons.

Table 1.—Birds Killed at a Television Tower at Topeka, Kansas, in 1954

See annotated list for division into sex- and age-classes. Where discrepancies exist between totals given here and totals given in the annotated list, these result from the fact that some specimens could not be sexed and aged.

Sept. 25Oct. 1Oct. 3Oct. 4Oct. 5Oct. 6Oct. 7Oct. 8Oct. 9Oct. 10Oct. 23Totals
Pied-billed Grebe1113
Green Heron11
Blue-winged Teal1168
Virginia Rail314
Sora1611110
American Coot33
Mourning Dove81110
Yellow-billed Cuckoo11
Black-billed Cuckoo11
Yellow-shafted Flicker33
Yellow-bellied Flycatcher11
House Wren23121110
Long-billed Marsh Wren1113
Short-billed Marsh Wren1214
Catbird128116643
Brown Thrasher1113
Wood Thrush33
Hermit Thrush11
Olive-backed Thrush141116
Golden-crowned Kinglet156
Ruby-crowned Kinglet21811114
Yellow-throated Vireo11
Blue-headed Vireo11912583140
Red-eyed Vireo183621323175
Philadelphia Vireo3912
Warbling Vireo819141134
Black and White Warbler1135
Tennessee Warbler11215
Orange-crowned Warbler714141951152
Nashville Warbler794433927511181
Parula Warbler112
Yellow Warbler33118
Magnolia Warbler123
Black-throated Blue Warbler213
Myrtle Warbler11
Black-throated Green Warbler11
Chestnut-sided Warbler112
Bay-breasted Warbler123
Palm Warbler314
Oven-bird421231132
Northern Water-thrush516
Mourning Warbler15642112195
Yellow-throat1011524251811176
Yellow-breasted Chat11
Wilson Warbler123
Canada Warbler22
American Redstart11
Bobolink44
Rose-breasted Grosbeak22
Indigo Bunting12317
Dickcissel3113136
Savannah Sparrow161151116
Grasshopper Sparrow723311118
Leconte Sparrow33
Sharp-tailed Sparrow1113
Slate-colored Junco11
Clay-colored Sparrow1112115
Fox Sparrow11
Lincoln Sparrow41752231382
Swamp Sparrow1124
Song Sparrow22
Total—species224163133129161081561
Total—individuals945851632614614731108241090

The annotated list may be consulted for further data in connection with the species listed in Table 1. As is indicated below, we regard the figures of this sample as unreliable to an unknown degree in comparing the relative abundance of one species with another. Accumulation of such data from various localities, however, should prove useful in another type of comparison. Samples of the same species killed in the same way at about the same time at different localities should be directly comparable. Eventually, this should provide us with a means of determining relative abundance of a species in different parts of its migratory route.

Approximately 200 of the most interesting specimens were preserved as study skins and are in the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History. An effort was made to preserve at least one of each species, and we fell only a few short of this goal. All of the forms rare in Kansas are represented by skins. We could see no reason to list the preserved specimens in detail here. Species of which no study skins were made, however, are so marked.

So far as we can tell, no truly western subspecies (from west of the Great Plains) occurred in the Topeka sample. Probably most or all of the birds came from areas more or less directly north of eastern Kansas.

In critical areas where different subspecies of the same species occur together in migration, data from samples of this kind should prove enlightening. In future analyses, conducted in such areas, it might be possible to preserve all specimens of some of the variable species, or at least to measure all individuals of species in which size is the most important variable character. Quantitative study could then be made of the different geographic variants occurring, their proportions in the migrant population determined, and their origins deduced. In studying populations of Painted Buntings (Passerina ciris) wintering in Mexico, Storer (1951) has provided an interesting demonstration of methods which can be applied to such samples.