[181] Thus Karl Müller, who treats the subject exhaustively in “Luthers Schlussworte in Worms, 1521,” in “Philotesia,” dedicated to P. Kleinert, Berlin, 1907, pp. 269, 289. Cp. the review by N. Paulus, “Kölnische Volksztg.,” 1908, No. 1000.
[182] “Die Depeschen des Nuntius Aleander vom Wormser Reichstag,” 1897, p. 174, n. 2.
[183] “Luther im Lichte der neueren Forschung²,” p. 25.
[184] “Schriften des Vereins für Reformationsgesch.,” No. 100, p. 26.
[185] Cp. above, p. 62, n. 2, the quotation from the “Table-Talk.”
[186] The Frankfort delegate, in Janssen-Pastor, “Hist. of the German People,” Engl. Trans., 3, p. 191.
[187] Cordatus, “Tagebuch,” p. 474.
[188] Köstlin-Kawerau, 1, pp. 409, 771.
[189] In the Diary of Marino Sanuto, “R. deputaz. Veneta di Storia Patria,” t. 30, Venezia, 1891, 212. At the end of the passage Denifle (in “Luther,” 1², p. 589, n. 1) proposed that “impudentiam” should be read in place of “imprudentiam” (i.e. “impudenza” in place of “imprudenza”), as the want of “prudence” had already been blamed. When Contarini speaks of Luther as “assai incontinente,” the “incontinence” is that of temper.
[190] Janssen-Pastor, “Hist. of the German People,” Engl. Trans., 3, 191.