[894] P. Drews, as above, p. 193, n. 2, p. 74. Drews adds: “But it would be premature to conclude from the above that this thought, because not expressed here, is altogether excluded.” Yet it would appear to be excluded by the reference to the bishops, who alone were to trouble themselves concerning any danger to the Church through heresy (p. 301). How Luther, nevertheless, makes the duty of the Lutheran rulers to protect religion the foundation first of his practice, and then of his theory, is shown in the next section, also in vol. iii., xv. 2, and vol. v., xxxv. 2.
[895] See above, p. 104 ff.
[896] “Die Renaissance des Christentums im 16. Jahrhundert,” 1904, p. 36.
[897] “Der Zusammenhang von Reformation und politischer Freiheit” (“Theolog. Arbeiten aus dem rhein. wiss. Predigerverein,” N. F., Hft. 12, Tübingen, 1910, pp. 44-79, 54).
[898] “Werke,” Erl. ed., 22, p. 86 seq.
[899] “Werke,” Erl. ed., 22, p. 92.
[900] Ibid., p. 97.
[901] Ibid., p. 90.
[902] “Werke,” Weim. ed., 18, p. 293; Erl. ed., 24², p. 273.
[903] “Werke,” Erl. ed., 53, p. 111 (“Briefwechsel,” 3, p. 298).