[1363] N. Paulus, “Schatzgeyer,” 1898; “Hoffmeister,” 1891; A. Postina, “Billick,” 1901.
[1364] J. Negwer, “Conrad Wimpina,” Breslau, 1909 (in “KGl. Abh.”)
[1365] Karl Goedeke, Introd. to his edition of Murner’s “Narrenbeschwörung,” Leipzig, 1879. Janssen, “Hist. of the German People” (Engl. Trans.), 11, p. 333.
[1366] Goedeke, ibid.
[1367] “Memoriale B. Petri Faber,” ed. Marc. Bouix, Paris, 1873, pp. 378, 370.
[1368] Dan. Bartoli, “Opere,” 5, Torino, 1825, pp. 110, 116. Cp. B. Duhr, “Gesch. der Jesuiten,” etc., 1, 1907, 3 ff. Not all the members of the Order to which Favre and Canisius belonged were faithful to Favre’s principles in the controversy against Luther and his teaching, particularly during the excited polemics of the 17th century. Many, at their own costs, disregarded those laws of urbanity which Bellarmine, for instance, ever respected in his controversial writings. Such was the case, for instance, with Conrad Vetter, † 1622 (K. A. J. Andreæ).
[1369] “Werke,” Weim. ed., 2, p. 404; “Opp. lat. var.,” 3, p. 247. He refers to Panormitanus, “De elect.,” c. Significasti.
[1370] “Werke,” Weim. ed., 2, p. 18 ff.; “Opp. lat. var.,” 2, p. 385 seq.
[1371] Ibid., p. 288=p. 75.
[1372] Ibid., p. 303=p. 97 seq.: “Concilium aliquando errasse, præsertim in iis quæ non sunt fidei.” Cp. the following: “conciliorum statuta in iis quæ sunt fidei, sunt omnimodo amplectenda.”