[1160] See Lauterbach’s “Tagebuch,” p. 117, for both.
[1161] “Werke,” Weim. ed., 24, p. 162; Erl. ed., 33, p. 161. Cp. Erl. ed., 60, pp. 37, 39.
[1162] Mathesius, “Tischreden,” p. 198 (1540). “Werke,” Erl. ed., 60, p. 39 f.
[1163] Mathesius, “Tischreden,” p. 198. “Werke,” Erl. ed., 60, p. 40.
[1164] Mathesius, “Tischreden,” p. 129 (1540).
[1165] Ib., p. 380 (1536).
[1166] Lauterbach, “Tagebuch,” p. 121. “Colloq.,” ed. Bindseil, 3, p. 12.
[1167] Lauterbach, ib.
[1168] Mathesius, “Tischreden,” p. 129.
[1169] Ib.: there is no “motus de loco,” etc., all this “phantasmata sunt.” Similarly in “Werke,” Weim. ed., 1, p. 409; “Opp. lat. exeg.,” 12, p. 17 sq.: the metamorphosis of old women into tom-cats and the nocturnal excursions of the witches to banquets are “delusions of the devil, not actual occurrences”; he, however, admits the possibility.