[2267] In the Preface to the reader: “Visitator nova mitra infulatur, novum ambiens papatum,” etc.
[2268] Aug. 10, 1528, “Briefwechsel,” 6, p. 337.
[2269] Words of K. Müller, “Kirche, Gemeinde und Obrigkeit nach Luther,” p. 71 f. He also gives a survey of the Instructions.
[2270] For the text see Sehling, ib., p. 143.
[2271] “Werke,” Weim. ed., 26, p. 197; Erl. ed., 23, p. 5.
[2272] Müller, ib., p. 67. N. Paulus, “Protestantismus und Toleranz,” p. 14.
[2273] Ib.
[2274] See Th. Kolde, “Friedrich der Weise,” 1881, p. 69 f.
[2275] Ib., p. 38.
[2276] Carl Holl, “Luther und das Landesherrliche Kirchenregiment” (“1 Ergänzungsheft zur Zeitschr. für Theol. und Kirche”), Tübingen, 1911, p. 54, against C. Müller, “Kirche, Gemeinde und Obrigkeit nach Luther.” Holl says: “The two documents cannot be reconciled, for each attempts not merely to describe or emphasise one side of the matter, but to set forth the whole, and this they do from totally different points of view. One seeks to represent the Visitation as the outcome of the paternal care of the Elector, the other as an act of self-help on the part of the Church. It is impossible to harmonise these two points of view.”