Statement of Results.—Fifty cubic centimeters of the sodium thiosulfate equal 500 milligrams of iodin; therefore, 42.3 cubic centimeters of the thiosulfate solution equal 423 milligrams of iodin. The difference equals seventy-seven milligrams of iodin absorbed by 101 milligrams of the flaxseed oil. Therefore, the iodin number equivalent and the milligrams of iodin absorbed by 100 milligrams of flaxseed oil equal 76.2.
It is evident from the above determination that the iodin number of the oil, when obtained in the manner described, is less than half that secured by the usual hübl process. Since the solvent employed, however, is more stable than chloroform when in contact with iodin or bromin, the proposed variation is one worthy of the careful attention of analysts.
McIlhiney has called especial attention to the low numbers given by the method of Gantter, and from a study of the data obtained concludes that iodin alone will not saturate glycerids, no matter what the solvents may be.[296]
It is clear, therefore, that the process of Gantter cannot give numbers which are comparable with those obtained by the usual iodin method. Any comparative value possessed by the data given by the process of Gantter must be derived by confining it to the numbers secured by the carbon tetrachlorid process alone.
335. Substitution of Iodin Monochlorid for Hübl’s Reagent.—Ephraim has shown that iodin monochlorid may be conveniently substituted for the hübl reagent with the advantage that it can be safely used at once, while the hübl reagent undergoes somewhat rapid changes when first prepared. The present disadvantage of the process is found in the fact that the iodin monochlorid of commerce is not quite pure and each new lot requires to be titrated for the determination of its purity.
The reagent is prepared of such a strength as to contain 16.25 grams of iodin monochlorid per liter. The solvent used is alcohol. The operation is carried out precisely as in the hübl method, substituting the alcoholic solution of iodin monochlorid for the iodin reagent proposed by Hübl.[297] If the iodin monochlorid solution, after acting on the oil, be titrated without previous addition of potassium iodid a new value is obtained, the chloriodin number. In titrating, the sodium thiosulfate is added until the liquid, which is made brown by the separated iodin, becomes yellow. At this point the solution is diluted, starch paste added, and the titration completed.
336. Preservation of the Hübl Reagent.—To avoid the trouble due to changes in the strength of Hübl’s reagent, Mahle adds hydrochloric acid to it at the time of its preparation.[298] The reagent is prepared as follows: Twenty-five grams of iodin dissolved in a quarter of a liter of ninety-five per cent alcohol are mixed with the same quantity of mercuric chlorid in 200 cubic centimeters of alcohol, the same weight of hydrochloric acid of 1.19 specific gravity added and the volume of the mixture completed to half a liter with alcohol. After five days such a solution gave, on titration, 49.18 instead of 49.31 grams per liter of iodin.
It will be observed that this solution is double the usual strength, but this does not influence the accuracy of the analytical data obtained. It appears that the hübl number is not, therefore, an iodin number, but expresses the total quantity of iodin, chlorin and oxygen absorbed by the fat during the progress of the reaction.
337. Bromin Addition Number.—In the process of Hübl and others an attempt is made to determine the quantity of a halogen, e.g., iodin, which the oil, fat or resin will absorb under certain conditions. The numbers obtained, however, represent this absorption only approximately, because the halogen may disappear through substitution as well as absorption. Whether or not a halogen is added, i. e., absorbed or substituted, may be determined experimentally.
The principle on which the determination depends rests on the fact that a halogen, e. g., bromin, forms a molecule of hydrobromic acid for every atom of bromin substituted, while in a simple absorption of the halogen no such action takes place. If, therefore, bromin be brought into contact with a fat, oil or resin, the determination of the quantity of hydrobromic acid formed will rigidly determine the quantity of bromin substituted during the reaction. If this quantity be deducted from the total bromin which has disappeared, the relative quantities of the halogen added and substituted are at once determined. In the method of McIlhiney[299] bromin is used instead of iodin because the addition figures of iodin are in general much too low.