[10]

Numerous examples are given by Moll, Konträre Sexualempfindung, third edition, pp. 265-268.

[11]

Chevalier (De l'Inversion, 1885; id., L'Inversion Sexuelle, 1892, p. 52), followed by E. Laurent (L'Amour Morbide, 1891, Chapter X), separates this group from other fetichistic perversions, under the head of "azoöphilie." I see no adequate ground for this step. The various forms of fetichism are too intimately associated to permit of any group of them being violently separated from the others.

[12]

This has already been considered as a perversion founded on vision, in discussing Sexual Selection in Man. IV.