Front of Fence showing Present Rearrangement of Panels
TESTS INAUGURATED IN 1907
CHART OF RESULTS OF SECOND ANNUAL INSPECTION OF ATLANTIC CITY TEST FENCE, MAY, 1910
| FORMULAS | REPORT OF INSPECTION | Pan- el Num- ber | ||||||||||||||||||||
| For- mu- la Num- ber | Basic Car- bon- ate White Lead | Zinc Ox- ide | Basic Sul- phate White Lead | Zin Lead White | inert pigments | |||||||||||||||||
| Calci- um Car- bon- ate | Calci- um Sul- phate | Mag- ne- sium Sili- cate | Bari- um Sul- phate | Silica | Blanc Fixe | |||||||||||||||||
| CHALKING | CHECKING | GENERAL CONDITION | REMARKS | |||||||||||||||||||
| % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |||||||||||||
| 1 | 30 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Very slight | Very slight | Good | 1 | ||||||||
| 2 | 50 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Medium | Slight | Very good | 3 | ||||||||
| 3 | 20 | 50 | 20 | — | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | Medium | Slight | Good | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 48 | .5 | 48 | .5 | — | — | 3 | .0 | — | — | — | — | — | Very slight | Slight | Good | 7 | |||||
| 5 | 22 | 50 | — | — | 2 | — | 26 | — | — | — | Slight | Slight | Good | 9 | ||||||||
| 6 | — | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | 36 | — | — | Very slight | Slight | Good | 11 | ||||||||
| 7 | 37 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Medium | Slight | Good | 13 | ||||||||
| 8 | 38 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | — | Slight | Very slight | Good | 15 | ||||||||
| 9 | — | 73 | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | 25 | — | Very bad | Deep, with scaling | Poor | 17 | ||||||||
| 10 | 44 | 46 | — | — | 5 | — | 5 | — | — | — | Heavy | Deep | Medium | 19 | ||||||||
| 11 | 50 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Medium | Medium | Fair | 21 | ||||||||
| 12 | 60 | 34 | — | — | — | 6% Inert Pigment | — | Medium | Deep | Fair | 23 | |||||||||||
| 13 | — | 27 | 60 | — | 3 | — | 10 | — | — | — | Medium | Slight | Very good | 25 | ||||||||
| 14 | 25 | 25 | 20 | — | 5 | 25 | — | — | — | — | Medium | Lateral | Fair | 27 | ||||||||
| 15 | 20 | 40 | — | 30 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | Slight | Visible with naked eye | Poor | 29 | ||||||||
| 16 | 33 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | 34 | — | — | Slight | Slight | Good | 31 | ||||||||
| 17 | 40 | 40 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 13 | — | 4 | Medium | Slight | Good | 33 | ||||||||
| 18 | 75 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Medium | Slight | Very good | 145 | ||||||||
| 19 | — | 25 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Considerable | Deep | Good | 147 | ||||||||
| 20 | 67 | .0 | 19 | .5 | — | — | 10 | .0 | — | 3 | .5 | — | — | — | Medium | Slight | Good | 149 | ||||
| 33 | 15 | 30 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | — | Medium | Slight | Very good | 176 | ||||||||
| 34 | 38 | .95 | 33 | .58 | 4 | .81 | — | 19 | .48 | — | — | 1 | .59 | 1 | .59 | — | Slight | Slight lateral | Good | 175 | ||
| 35 | 37 | .51 | 25 | .87 | 7 | .84 | — | 20 | .36 | — | — | 4 | .21 | 4 | .21 | — | Slight | Lateral | Good | 180 | ||
| 36 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Considerable | Heavy | Fair | Rough surface | 181 | |||||||
| 37 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Considerable | Heavy and deep | Poor | Rough surface | 182 | |||||||
| 38 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | More than Panel no. 182 | Very deep | Poor | 177 | ||||||||
| 39 | — | — | — | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | Considerable | Very slight | Good | 178 | ||||||||
| 40 | — | — | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Heavy | Slight | Good | 168 | ||||||||
| 45 | — | 90 | — | — | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | Slight | Slight | Good | 170 | ||||||||
| 46 | — | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | 39 | — | — | Slight | Medium | Fair | 169 | ||||||||
| 47 | — | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | None | Very deep | Poor | 172 | ||||||||
“There are no pigments possessing greater hiding properties when first used than white leads, but the lack of hiding power on the white lead panels after two years’ exposure was caused by the chalking away of the lead. The superior hiding power of the composite paints was due to the action of the other pigments in these combination paints in preventing the lead from chalking away.
“The Committee finds that the addition of a reasonable percentage of zinc oxide to white lead increases its durability and retards its chalking, renders it whiter, and forms a surface that presents a much better repainting condition. The combinations of white lead and zinc oxide on the Atlantic City Test Fence were in general good condition throughout.
“Corroded white lead, sublimed white lead, zinc oxide, and zinc lead are the standard white opaque pigments. They were all tested on the Atlantic City Fence and it was found that to use any one alone results in inferior protection to the wood. Barium sulphate, silica, asbestine, china clay, and calcium carbonate are the standard crystalline pigments. In the past, the overloading of paints with these crystalline or inert pigments has been the cause of the prejudice that painters have had against their use. It has been established beyond controversy, however, that the use of these pigments, in moderate percentage, combined with any of the standard opaque white pigments, such as white leads, zinc oxide, etc., undoubtedly results in better service from every standpoint and forms the most satisfactory white paint for general outside use. Some of the most perfect painted surfaces on the fence were those made on the above basis as reference to the charted report will show.”