Fig. 212.—Toothed Birds (Odontornithes) of the Cretaceous Rocks of America. a. Left lower jaw of Ichthyornis dispar, slightly enlarged; b, Left lower jaw of Hesperornis regalis, reduced to nearly one-fourth of the natural size; c. Cervical vertebra of Ichthyornis dispar, front view, twice the natural size; c', Side view of the same; d, Tooth of Hesperornis regalis, enlarged to twice the natural size. (After Marsh.) sunk in distinct sockets, they are simply implanted in a deep continuous groove in the bony substance of the jaw. The front of the upper jaw does not carry teeth, and was probably encased in a horny beak. The breast-bone is entirely destitute of a central ridge or keel, and the wings are minute and quite rudimentary; so that Hesperornis, unlike Ichthyornis, must have been wholly deprived of the power of flight, in this respect approaching the existing Penguins. The tail consists of about twelve vertebræ, of which the last three or four are amalgamated to form a flat terminal mass, there being at the same time clear indications that the tail was capable of up and down movement in a vertical plane, this probably fitting it to serve as a swimming-paddle or rudder. The legs were powerfully constructed, and the feet were adapted to assist the bird in rapid motion through the water. The known remains of Hesperornis regalis prove it to have been a swimming and diving bird, of larger dimensions than any of the aquatic members of the class of Birds with which we are acquainted at the present day. It appears to have stood between five and six feet high, and its inability to fly is fully compensated for by the numerous adaptations of its structure to a watery life. Its teeth prove it to have been carnivorous in its habits, and it probably lived upon fishes. It is a curious fact that two Birds agreeing with one another in the wholly abnormal character of possessing teeth, and in other respects so entirely different, should, like Ichthyornis and Hesperornis, have lived not only in the same geological period, but also in the same geographical area; and it is equally curious that the area inhabited by these toothed Birds should at the same time have been tenanted by winged and bird-like Reptiles belonging to the toothed genus Pterodactylus and the toothless genus Pteranodon.

No remains of Mammals, finally, have as yet been detected in any sedimentary accumulations of Cretaceous age.

LITERATURE.

The following list comprises some of the more important works and memoirs which may be consulted with reference to the Cretaceous strata and their fossil contents:—

(1)'Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain.'
(2)'Geology of England and Wales.' Conybeare and Phillips.
(3)'Geology of Yorkshire,' vol. ii. Phillips.
(4)'Geology of Oxford and the Thames Valley.' Phillips.
(5)'Geological Excursions through the Isle of Wight.' Mantell.
(6)'Geology of Sussex.' Mantell.
(7)'Report on Londonderry,' &c. Portlock.
(8)'Recherches sur le Terrain Crétacé Supérieur de l'Angleterre et de l'Irlande.' Barrois.
(9)"Geological Survey of Canada"—'Report of Progress, 1872-73.'
(10)'Geological Survey of California.' Whitney.
(11)'Geological Survey of Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah.' Hayden and Meek.
(12)'Report on Geology,' &c. (British North American Boundary Commission). G. M. Dawson.
(13)'Manual of Geology.' Dana.
(14)'Lethæa Rossica.' Eichwald.
(15)'Petrefacta Germaniæ.' Goldfuss.
(16)'Fossils of the South Downs.' Mantell.
(17)'Medals of Creation.' Mantell.
(18)'Mineral Conchology.' Sowerby.
(19)'Lethæa Geognostica.' Bronn.
(20)'Malacostracous Crustacea of the British Cretaceous Formation' (Palæontographical Society). Bell.
(21)'Brachiopoda of the Cretaceous Formation' (Palæontographical Society). Davidson.
(22)'Corals of the Cretaceous Formation' (Palæontographical Society). Milne-Edwards and Haime.
(23)'Supplement to the Fossil Corals' (Palæontographical Society). Martin Duncan.
(24)'Echinodermata or the Cretaceous Formation' (Palæontographical Society). Wright.
(25)'Monograph of the Belemnitidæ' (Palæontographical Society). Phillips.
(26)'Monograph of the Trigoniæ' (Palæontographical Society). Lycett.
(27)'Fossil Cirripedes' (Palæontographical Society). Darwin.
(28)'Fossil Mollusca of the Chalk of Britain' (Palæontographical Society). Sharpe.
(29)'Entomostraca of the Cretaceous Formation' (Palæontographical Society). Rupert Jones.
(30)'Monograph of the Fossil Reptiles of the Cretaceous Formation' (Palæontographical Society). Owen.
(31)'Manual of Palæontology.' Owen.
(32)'Synopsis of Extinct Batrachia and Reptilia.' Cope.
(33)"Structure of the Skull and Limbs in Mosasauroid Reptiles"—'American Journ. Sci. and Arts, 1872.' Marsh.
(34)"On Odontornithes"—'American Journ. Sci. and Arts, 1875.' Marsh.
(35)'Ossemens Fossiles.' Cuvier.
(36)'Catalogue of Ornithosauria.' Seeley.
(37)'Paléontologie Française.' D'Orbigny.
(38)'Synopsis des Echinides fossiles.' Desor.
(39)'Cat. Raisonné des Echinides.' Agassiz and Desor.
(40)"Echinoids"—'Decades of the Geol. Survey of Britain.' E. Forbes.
(41)'Paléontologie Française.' Cotteau.
(42)'Versteinerungen der Böhmischen Kreide-formation.' Reuss.
(43)"Cephalopoda, Gasteropoda, Pelecypoda, Brachiopoda; &c., of the Cretaceous Rocks of India"—'Palæontologica Indica,' ser. i., iii., v., vi., viii. Stoliczka.
(44)"Cretaceous Reptiles of the United States"—'Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge,' vol. xiv. Leidy.
(45)'Invertebrate Cretaceous, and Tertiary Fossils of the Upper Missouri Country,' 1876. Meek.

CHAPTER XVIII.

THE EOCENE PERIOD.

Before commencing the study of the subdivisions of the Kainozoic series, there are some general considerations to be noted. In the first place, there is in the Old World a complete and entire physical break between the rocks of the Mesozoic and Kainozoic periods. In no instance in Europe are Tertiary strata to be found resting conformably upon any Secondary rock. The Chalk has invariably suffered much erosion and denudation before the lowest Tertiary strata were deposited upon it. This is shown by the fact that the actually eroded surface of the Chalk can often be seen; or, failing this, that we can point to the presence of the chalk-flints in the Tertiary strata. This last, of course, affords unquestionable proof that the Chalk must have been subjected to enormous denudation prior to the formation of the Tertiary beds, all the chalk itself having been removed, and nothing left but the flints, while these are all rolled and rounded. In the continent of North America, on the other hand, the lowest Tertiary strata have been shown to graduate downwards conformably with the highest Cretaceous beds, it being a matter of difficulty to draw a precise line of demarcation between the two formations.

In the second place, there is a marked break in the life of the Mesozoic and Kainozoic periods. With the exception of a few Foraminifera, and one Brachiopod (the latter doubtful), no Cretaceous species is known to have survived the Cretaceous period; while several characteristic families, such as the Ammonitidœ, Belemnitidœ, and Hippuritidœ, died out entirely with the close of the Cretaceous rocks. In the Tertiary rocks, on the other hand, not only are all the animals and plants more or less like existing types, but we meet with a constantly-increasing number of living species as we pass from the bottom of the Kainozoic series to the top. Upon this last fact is founded the modern classification of the Kainozoic rocks, propounded by Sil Charles Lyell.