[670] Memoria de diversos Autos, Autos 10, 11, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 (Appendix).
[671] Bibl. nacionale de France, fonds espagnol, 81.—Memoria de diversos Autos, Auto 43, n. 6; Auto 45, n. 1.
[672] Libro Verde (Revista de España, CVI, 287, 589.—Ibid. MS. fol. 65-74).
[673] Memoria de diversos Autos, Auto 36, n. 1.—Bibl. nacionale de France, fonds espagnol, 80.
[674] It is impossible to construct a full catalogue of the victims. Llorente undoubtedly exaggerates when he asserts (Hist. crít. Chap. VI, Art. v, n. 1) that the executions numbered more than 200 and so does Amador de los Rios (III, 266) in saying that the greater part of those who appeared in the Saragossa autos from 1486 to 1492 were accomplices in the murder. The sentences abstracted in the Memoria show that but few of them were concerned in it.
Anchias, the notary of the tribunal, in his account of the affair, only enumerates as put to death three treasurers of the fund, five assassins and four accomplices besides Sancho de Paternoy and Alonso de Alagon who escaped with imprisonment through friendly influences (Libro Verde, Revista, CVI, 287). The indications in the Memoria are incomplete as, after May, 1489, the crimes of the culprits are not stated but, so far as it goes and comparing it with the Libro Verde and other sources, I find nine executed in person, besides two suicides, thirteen burnt in effigy and four penanced for complicity. Besides these are two penanced for suborning false witness in favor of Luis de Santangel and seventeen for aiding or sheltering the guilty, and two for rejoicing at the crime. Altogether, fifty or sixty will probably cover the total of those who suffered in various ways.
The sanbenitos of the convicts, with inscriptions, were hung as customary in the cathedral and remain there to the present day (Amador de los Rios, III, 266). The swords of the murderers are still to be seen attached to the pillars near the entrance to the chancel (V. de la Fuente, in Oviedo’s Quinquagenas, I, 73). One of the latter was removed in 1518, by order of Leo X, and when the commissioner who had performed the act died shortly afterward it was popularly regarded as a visitation of God (Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Hacienda, Legajo 10).
[675] Libro Verde (Revista, CVI, 250-1).—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 1—Arch. gén. de la C. de A., Reg. 3684, fol. 100.—Garibay, Compendio histórial, Lib. XIX, cap 1.—Amador de log Rios, III, 405.
[676] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 3, fol. 237; Libro 4, fol. 223.
[677] Libro Verde (Revista, CV, 568).