[233] Coleccion de Documentos LXVIII, 479.
[234] Bibl. nacional, MSS. Mm, 475.
[235] Salazar, cap. ult.
[236] Raynald. Annal. ann. 1560, n. 23.—Pallavicini Hist. Conc. Trident. Lib. XIV, cap. 12, n. 4.
[237] Bibliotheca nova, s. v. Bartholomaus Carranza.
[238] El Protestantismo comparado con el Catolicismo, II, 301, 306 (Barcelona, 1844). See also Tournon, Hommes illustres de l’Ordre de Saint Dominique, IV, 438. It should be added that Menéndez Pelayo (II, 376), after an examination of the testimony, asserts that it was sufficient to justify the prosecution. This may be so, according to inquisitorial methods, but not the persistent persecution that followed.
[239] Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 68.
[240] Hinojosa, Los Despachos de la Diplomacia pontificia, I, 303.
[241] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 63.
[242] Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 91.