[75] Various biographies of her have been written by Moran de Butron, Pietro del Spirito Santo, P. Gijon y Leon, P. Gius. Boero and Juan del Castillo, of some of which repeated editions have appeared.
[76] Pellicer, Avisos históricos (Semanario erúdito, XXXIII, 171).
[77] Ochoa, Epistolario español, II, 81.
[78] Vita Yen. Mariæ de Agreda, §§ 4, 6, 8, 13, 38.—Præfat. ad Lib. I, Vitæ B. Virginis.
[79] Archivo de Simancas, Inq. Leg. 1465, fol. 101.—Index Libb. prohib. Innoc. PP. XI, p. 167; Append. p. 41.—Reusch, Der Index, II, 253.—Mendham, Literary Policy of the Church of Rome, pp. 272-4 (London, 1830).—Phelippeaux, Relation de l’Origine etc. du Quietisme, I, 178-83 (s. l. 1732).
[80] D’Argentré, Collect. Judic. de novis Erroribus, III, I, 156.
[81] Analecta Franciscana, I, 92.—Reusch, Der Index, II, 256.—Amort de Revelationibus, P. II, p. 226.
[82] Index Clementis PP. XI, p. 292.—Index Bened. PP. XIV, 1744, p. 313. It is significant of the resultant dubious position of the books that Caetano Marcecales, in his Enchiridium mysticum (Veronæ, 1766), while giving two lists of mystic works, one permitted and the other prohibited, wholly omits the writings of María de Agreda.
[83] Archivo hist. nacional, Inq. de Toledo, Leg. 1.—Biblioteca Casanatense, MS. X. v, 27, fol. 235.
[84] Bordoni Sacrum Tribunal Judicum, p. 508 (Romæ, 1648).—Ign. Lupi Bergomens. Nova Lux in Edictum S. Inquisit. (Bergomi, 1648).