[114] Bernino, op. cit., IV, 727-8.
[115] Royal Library of Munich, Cod. Ital. 209, fol. 67 sqq.—Cf. Phelippeaux, Relation du Quietisme, II, 117, 154.
[116] Laemmer, op. cit., p. 427.—Heppe, Geschichte der quietistischen Mystik, p. 445.
[117] Mongitore, L’Atto pubblico di Fede celebrato à 6 Aprile, 1724 (Palermo 1724).
[118] See the extracts from S. François de Sales collected by Fénelon, in his Fifth Letter.—Œuvres, II, 95-98 (Paris, 1838).
[119] Noack, Die christliche Mystic, II, 236 (Königsberg, 1853).
[120] Heppe, op. cit., p. 88.
[121] Abomination des Abominations des fausses Devotions de ce Tems divisées, en Trois, la premiere des Illuminez; la seconde des nouveaux Adamites; la troisieme des Spirituels à la mode, p. 88 (Paris, 1632).
[122] Bossuet, who read her autobiography in MS. tells us of this tympanitic condition and the splitting of her garments (De Quietismo, ap. Laemmer, op. cit., p. 423). In the printed life, this special feature is omitted, but the passage has every appearance of curtailment (II, 33, cf. 234; III, 9).
[123] Bossuet’s side in this controversy is elaborately set forth in Phelippeaux’s posthumous “Relation de l’Origine, du Progrès et de la Condemnation du Quiétisme,” 2 vols., 1732 (s. l.). Also in Bossuet’s “Relation sur le Quiétisme” and subsequent controversial writings, Paris, 1698. Madame Guyon’s statements are contained in “La Vie de Madame J. M. B. de la Mothe Guion, écrite por Elle-même,” 3 vols. Cologne, 1720. She is defended in the “Lettres de M. xxx (Abbé de la Blatterie) à un Ami au sujet de la Relation du Quiétisme,” 1733 (s. l.). Fénelon’s writings on the subject are in his Œuvres, T. II, Paris, 1838.