A History of the Inquisition of Spain; vol. 4

by Henry Charles Lea

[222] Páramo, p. 886.

[223] A Cunha, Q. IX, XI.—De Sousa, Tract. I, cap. vi, vii, xvii.—Alberghini Manuale Qualificatorum, cap. XXXI, § 1, n. 10, 11, 17.—Trimarchi, pp. 193, 199, 2O1, 212.—Cozza, Dub. IX, X, XI.—Bodoni Manuale, Sect. XXV, n. 169—Bibl. nacional, MSS., V, 377, cap. XX, §§ 5, 10.

[224] Archivo hist. nacional, Inq. de Valencia, Leg. 376.—Archivo de Simancas, Inq., Registro de Solicitantes, A, 7, fol. 2 (Lib. 1002, fol. 2).

[225] The more important of these decisions were—

3 There is no parvitas materiæ in solicitation.

8 When the solicitation is mutual, the confessor is to be denounced.

9 A confessor yielding to solicitation through fear is to be denounced.

10 Solicitation in other sacraments does not fall within the papal bulls.

11 Solicitation to other than carnal sins during confession does not require denunciation.

12 When a confessor praises the beauty of a penitent, if the praise is serious and without evil intention, he is not liable to denunciation; if otherwise, he is.