[379] Monstrelet, II. 86.—Jean Chartier, p. 25.—Journal d’un Bourgeois de Paris, an 1435.—L’Averdy (ubi sup. III. 8).—Chronique et Procès, pp. 462-4.
[380] Monstrelet, II. 86.—Chronique, p. 462.—Procès, pp. 478, 480-1, 486, 487, 488, 489.—Le Brun de Charmettes, Histoire de Jeanne d’Arc, III. 182-3.
[381] Journal d’un Bourgeois de Paris, an 1429.—Le Brun de Charmettes, III. 201-7, 210-12, 215, 224-6.—Procès, pp. 465-7, 477.—L’Averdy, pp. 391, 475, 499.
At least one of the assessors, Thomas de Courcelles, was a man of the highest character and of distinguished learning. Immediately after the trial of Joan he played a distinguished part at the Council of Basle, in opposing the claims of the papacy. Æneas Sylvius says of him, “Inter sacrarum literarum doctores insignis, quo nemo plura ex decretis sacri concilii dictavit, vir juxta doctrinam mirabilis et amabilis, sed modesta quadam verecundia semper intnens terram” (Æn. Sylv. Comment. de Gestis Concil. Basil. Lib. I. p. 7, Ed. 1571).—He died in 1469 as Dean of Nôtre Dame (Le Brun, III. 235).
[382] Ripoll III. 8.—Procès, pp. 467-8, 470, 509.—Le Brun de Charmettes, III. 188, 192, 219, 407-8.—L’Averdy, p. 391.
[383] Procès, pp. 468-9.
[384] Procès, pp. 468, 472, 473, 476, 486, 487, 489, 501.—L’Averdy, pp. 107, 395.
[385] Procès, p. 487.
[386] Procès, pp. 489, 491, 494, 495, 499, 500, 501.
When, in 1456, the memory of Joan was rehabilitated, and the sentence condemning her was pronounced null and void, it was of course necessary to show that she had not refused to submit to the Church. Evidence was furnished to prove that Nicholas l’Oyseleur, in whom she continued to have confidence, secretly advised her that she was lost if she submitted herself to the Church; but that Jean de la Fontaine, another of the assessors, visited her in prison with two Dominicans, Isambard de la Pierre and Martin l’Advenu, and explained to her that at the Council of Basle, then sitting, there were as many of her friends as of enemies, and at the next hearing, on March 30, Frère Isambard de la Pierre openly repeated the suggestion, in consequence of which she offered to submit to it, and also demanded to be taken to the pope, all of which Cauchon forbade to be inserted in the record, and but for the active intervention of Jean le Maître, the inquisitor, all three would have incurred grave peril of death (L’Averdy, pp. 476-7.—Le Brun de Charmettes, IV. 8-13.—Buchon, pp. 518-19). The rehabilitation proceedings are quite as suspect as those of the trial; every one then was anxious to make a record for himself and to prove that Joan had been foully dealt with. As late as the nineteenth interrogatory, on March 27, 1431, Jean de la Fontaine was one of those who voted in favor of the most rigorous dealings with Joan (Procès, p. 495).