[403] Minuc. Felic. loc. cit.—Tertull. Apol. adv. Gentes c. 22.—Lactant. Divin. Instit. v. 22.—Testam. XII. Patriarch. I. 2-3.—Augustin. de Divin. Dæmon, c. 3, 4, 5, 6; de Civ. Dei XV. 23, XXI. 10; Enarrat. in Psalm. 61, 63.—Isidor. Hispalens. Lib. de Ord. Creatur. c. 8.
[404] Origen. sup. Jesu Nave Homil. XV. 5, 6.—Ivon. Carnotens. Decret. XI. 106.—Pselli de Operat. Dæmon. Dial.—Gregor. PP. I. Dial. I. 4.—Cæsar, Heisterb. Dial. Dist. IV., V., XI. 17, XII. 5.—B. Richalmi Lib. de Insid. Dæmon. (Pez Thesaur. Anecd. I. II. 376).—S. Hildegardæ Epist. 67 (Martene Ampl. Coll. II. 1100).—Mall. Maleficar. P. II. Q. 1. c. 3.
It was not every one who, like St. Francis, when demons were threatening to torment him, could coolly welcome them, saying that his body was his worst enemy, and that they were free to do with it whatever Christ would permit—a view of the case which so abashed them that they incontinently departed.—Amoni, Legenda S. Francisci, Append, c. liii.
[405] Cæsar. Heisterb. III. 26, v. 9, 10, 35, 36.—Froissart, III. 22.
[406] Fr. Lenormant, La Magie chez les Chaldéens, p. 36.—Plutarch, vit. Numæ, IV.—Joseph. Antiq. Jud. I. 3.—Augustin. de Civ. Dei III. 5: XV. 23.—Gualt. Mapes de Nugis Curialium Dist. II. c. xi., xii., xiii.—Paul. Æginet. Instit. Med. III. 15.—Chrysost. Homil. in Genesim XXII., No. 2.—Clem. Alexand. Stromat. Libb. III., v. (Ed. Sylburg. pp. 450, 550).—Tertull. Apol. adv. Gentes, c. xxii.; De Carne Christi c. vi., xiv.—Hinemar. de Divort. Lothar. Interrog. xv.—Guibert. Noviogent. de Vita sua Lib. III. c. 19.—Cæsar. Heisterb. III. 8, 11, 13.—Gervas. Tilberien. Otia Imp. Decis. III. c. 86.—Matt. Paris. ann. 1249 (p. 514).—Chron. Bardin. (Vaissette, IV. Pr. 5).—Mémoires de Jacques Du Clercq, Liv. IV. c. 8.—Innoc. PP. VIII. Bull. Summis desiderantes, 2 Dec. 1484.—Silv. Prieriat. de Strigimagar Lib. I. c. 2; Lib. II. c. 3.
[407] Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola, La Strega, Milano, 1864, p. 80.—Thomæ Cantimpratens. Bonum universale, Lib. II. c. 55.—Alvar. Pelag. de Planct. Eccles. Lib. II. Art. xlv. No. 102.—Prieriatis de Strigimagar. II. iii., xi.—Sinistrari de Dæmonialitate No. 1-3.—Mall. Maleficar. P. II. Q. i. c. 4-8: P. II. Q. ii. c. 1.—Ulric. Molitor. Dial. de Python. Mulieribus Conclus. v.—Th. Aquin. Summ. I. li. Art. iii. No. 6.—Nider Formicar. Lib. v. c. ix., x.—Guill. Arvern. Episc. Paris. de Universo (Wright, Proceedings against Dame Alice Kyteler, Camden Soc. p. xxxviii.).—Villemarqué, Myrdhinn, ou l’Enchanteur Merlin, p. 11.—Alonso de Spina, Fortalicium Fidei, Ed. 1494, fol. 283.
[408] Tertull. de Corona c. iii.
[409] Rig Veda V. VIII. iv. 15, 16, 24 (Ludwig’s Rig Veda, Prag, 1876-8, II. 379, III. 345).—Atharva Veda II. 27, III. 6, IV. 18, V. 14, VI. 37, 75 (Grill, Hundert Lieder des Atharva Veda, Tübingen, 1879).
[410] Polano, Selections from the Talmud, pp. 174, 176.—Augustin. de Trinitate Lib. III. c. 8, 9.—Targum of Palestine on Exod. i.; vii. 11; Numb. xxii. 22.—Fabricii Cod. Pseudepig. Vet. Testam. I. 813; II. 106.—Chron. Samaritan, xli., xliii.
Curiously enough, the fame as magicians of Moses and of his opponents was preserved together. Pliny (N. H. XXX. 2) attributes the founding of what he calls the second school of magic to “Moses and Jannes and Lotapes.”