[197] Supplica al Re nostro Signore de’ Deputati por opporsi ai pregindizj del S. Officio. Sine nota sed Napoli, 1764.—Le Bret, Magazin zum Gebrauch der Staaten-und Kirchengeschichte, III, 160 (Frankfurt, 1773).
[198] Páramo, p. 219.
[199] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1. The salaries are as follows:
| Gabriel de Cardona, inquisitor, from the date of his embarcation | 150 | ducats. |
| Bartolomé de Castro, assessor | 50 | “ |
| An alguazil, with charge of prison, to be selected by Carmona | 20 | “ |
| Bernat Ros, notario del secreto y de los secuestros | —the salaries heretofore paid. | |
| Yourself | —the salaries heretofore paid. | |
[200] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.
[201] Páramo, pp. 220-222. For the Valencia experience of Domingo de Santa Cruz, see History of the Inquisition of Spain, Vol. I, p. 242.
[202] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 1.
[203] Ibidem. Páramo (p. 223) calls the appointee Magister Farris, subsequently created Bishop of Bonebolla—a see subsequently merged into that of Cagliari. There is no reference in Gams’s Series Episcoporum to such a bishopric in Sardinia. Páramo interposes a Nicolas Vaguer as inquisitor, from 1498 to 1500, which is evidently a mistake.
[204] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.
[205] Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1; Lib. 2, fol. 1.