The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies / Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada

by Henry Charles Lea

[563] Ibidem, pp. 33-4.

[564] El Museo Mexicano, 1843, p 361.

[565] Medina, op. cit., pp. 59-66.

[566] Fray Juan de la Concepcion, Historia general de Philipinas, T. IX, pp. 202-4.

[567] Medina, op. cit., pp. 151-4.

[568] Medina, op. cit., pp. 141-51.

[569] Ibidem, pp. 161-3.

[570] Juan de la Concepcion, XIV, 81-107.—Buzeta, Diccionario de las Islas Filipinas, I, 395 (Madrid, 1850).

[571] MSS. of Royal Library of Munich, Cod. Hisp. 79.

[572] Juan de la Concepcion, V, 276, 278. Puigblanch (La Inquisicion sin Mascara, Cádiz, 1811, p. 402) is in error in attributing the persecution of Archbishop Guerrero to the Inquisition and has misapprehended Palafox’s allusion to it. In both cases it was the Jesuits acting through jueces conservadores, who, by a monstrous abuse, assumed to exercise full papal powers, but in Mexico the Inquisition was with them and in Manila it was against them.