Fig. 18.
Fig. 19.
Fig. 20.
Fig. 21.
From Mr. Gillette's report,[[11]] supplemented by information furnished by Henry L. Gray, Assoc. M. Am. Soc. C. E., Engineer of the Railroad Commission of Washington, the following general statement as to methods is gleaned:
The plan involved, not only a determination of cost of reproduction and present value, but also original cost.
The appraiser was unable to adopt the methods followed in Wisconsin and Minnesota, in so far as they accepted the inventory of the railroads, but made his own examinations of records. The railroads of the State denied that they had any information whatever that would be of value to the Commission.