[242] Anderson, vol. iv. Part I. p. 120 and 125.
[243] Keith, Appendix, p. 145.
[244] Jebb, vol. ii. p. 671.
[245] Anderson, vol. ii. p. 185.
[246] Anderson, ibid. p. 187.—Laing, vol. ii. p. 296.
[247] Laing, Appendix p. 323.
[248] Laing, vol. ii. p. 298.
[249] Ibid. p. 300.
[250] Tytler, vol. i. p. 20.
[251] It is unnecessary to enter into any discussion regarding the second Confession of Paris, which has been so satisfactorily proved to be spurious, by Tytler, Whittaker, and Chalmers, and on which Robertson acknowledges “no stress is to be laid,” on account of the “improbable circumstances” it contains. See Tytler, vol. i. p. 286.—Whittaker, vol. ii. p. 305.—Chalmers, vol. ii. p. 50.—Robertson, vol. iii. p. 20.