A singular assertion is made in the Year Book 21 E. IV. p. 48 (Maynard's edit.), that a subsidy granted by the commons without assent of the peers is good enough. This cannot surely have been law at that time.
[g] Rot. Parl. vol. iii. p. 244.
[h] Coke's 4th Institute, p. 15.
[] Glanvil's Reports of Elections, edit. 1774; Introduction, p. 12.
[k] 4 Prynne, p. 261.
[m] Glanvil's Reports, ibid. from Prynne.
[n] Glanvil's Reports, ibid. from Prynne.
[o] Id. ibid. and Rot. Parl. vol. iii. p. 530.
[p] Rot. Parl. vol. v. p. 7.
[q] 3 Prynne's Register, p. 187. This hypothesis, though embraced by Prynne, is, I confess, much opposed to general opinion; and a very respectable living writer treats such an interpretation of the statute 7 H. IV. as chimerical. The words cited in the text, "as others," mean only, according to him, suitors not duly summoned. Heywood on Elections, vol. i. p. 20. But, as I presume, the summons to freeholders was by general proclamation; so that it is not easy to perceive what difference there could be between summoned and unsummoned suitors. And if the words are supposed to glance at the private summonses to a few friends, by means of which the sheriffs were accustomed to procure a clandestine election, one can hardly imagine that such persons would be styled "duly summoned." It is not unlikely, however, that these large expressions were inadvertently used, and that they led to that inundation of voters without property which rendered the subsequent act of Henry VI. necessary. That of Henry IV. had itself been occasioned by an opposite evil, the close election of knights by a few persons in the name of the county.