Practical Methods of Sewage Disposal for Residences, Hotels and Institutions

by Henry N. Ogden; H. Burdett Cleveland

Whatever the character of the sewage and whatever the kind of soil available for treatment, the method of dealing with sewage most obvious to most people has been to discharge the sewage directly into the nearest watercourse. This has been the practice of cities as well as of individual houses in the past, and the practice is very difficult to check because of the economy of this method of disposal. In many cases there is no objection to this method, and where a large stream is available, where no use is made further downstream of the waters for drinking purposes, and where the volume of water in the stream is sufficient to dilute the sewage to a point where no odors or objectionable appearances result, it would seem most uneconomical to adopt any more complicated method of disposal than by simply carrying the outfall pipe into the main bed of the stream.

In New York State, and in a number of other States, the number of which is continually increasing, such direct discharge, however, is not permitted by law except under certain conditions. In New York State it is required that any house, butter or cheese factory, manufacturing establishment, or village shall obtain the permission of the State Commissioner of Health before such a method of discharge be adopted, and in order to obtain this permission it must be definitely shown that the conditions of the stream are such that no reasonable objection to this method could be urged. The policy of the various Departments of Health in the United States is gradually becoming more and more rigorous in the matter of prohibiting the discharge of crude sewage into watercourses, and it is wise to make very sure that the discharge of sewage into streams is above the suspicion of a nuisance before adopting this as a suitable method. Rather would it seem better to provide for some method of treatment and allow only purified sewage to go into the stream than to run the risk of being forced in a few years to reconstruct the entire line of outfall pipe, with perhaps an entire reconstruction of the plumbing within the house.

The problem of treatment is the question of so modifying the character of a large volume of dirty water that it shall neither injure the quality of any drinking-water into which it may be discharged, nor cause objectionable odors, nor present disagreeable appearances in any body of water into which it may be emptied.

In order to properly understand a reasonable method of treatment some consideration must be given to the composition of sewage. This is chiefly water with which is mixed a small amount of animal, vegetable, and mineral matter. Roughly speaking, the amount of mineral dirt is about one tablespoonful to a barrelful of water, and the combined amount of animal and vegetable matter amounts to another tablespoonful. It seems almost impossible that so small a quantity of organic matter as one tablespoonful in a barrel of water could cause offense in any way, and yet engineers, city officials, and householders know by bitter experience that, when spread out on the surface of the ground or when allowed to stand in pools, water so polluted will undergo putrefaction resulting in most disagreeable odors and in complete stagnation. The problem of sewage treatment, then, consists in removing from the barrelful of water, the tablespoonful of organic dirt, whether animal or vegetable, in such a way that no odors shall be occasioned by the process and at the same time so that the cost of the process may be a reasonable one.

Unfortunately, the greater part of this organic matter is in solution, dissolved, like salt in water, so that, though undeniably present, it must be removed by some process more complicated and less obvious than that of simple straining. It would be comparatively simple if the polluting substances remained floating or suspended in the water. Then they could be strained out through a fine sieve or settled out in a tank, either with or without the aid of chemicals. But for particles in solution, straining, by itself, is useless and, while in large plants frequent use is made of sieves as a complement to the main process of purification, in small plants it is of so little value as hardly to deserve consideration.

Another factor enters to lessen the value of the use of screens or sieves in an installation for a single house. A great deal of the organic matter found in sewers requires both agitation and time for its subdivision into particles small enough to be acted upon in any process of purification adopted. If a screen is used, large particles of putrescible matter are held on the screen since not enough time has existed to break down their mass, and thus the screen itself becomes a most emphatic disturbance and a most objectionable feature of the purification plant.

For efficient purification, therefore, some method of reducing and modifying the character of organic solids, particularly those in solution, must be selected. In seeking a method by which this may be accomplished, scientific men found years ago that this very process was being carried on continually by natural forces, although at a very slow rate of purification. All organic matter, however formed and wherever present, is subject to the natural forces of decay. Fruits, vegetables, and meats of all kinds, exposed to the air, rapidly lose their original character and form and in the course of time disappear entirely. Except for this provision of nature, the accumulation of organic wastes since the beginning of the earth’s occupation by human beings would be so great that the earth would be uninhabitable on account of the deposits of waste matter which would have formed by this time. Nature, then, recognizes the need of disposing of organic wastes, and her method is the one which apparently must be followed by human beings if successful treatment is to be secured.

Only a few decades ago, it was found that this process of decay was due to the activity of very small organisms known as bacteria, and their agency was proved by experiments which showed that if vegetables or meat were kept free from bacteria, no decay, fermentation, or putrefaction took place. It was proved that the air itself was not responsible because in certain experiments air was allowed to enter through a filtering medium fine enough to strain out the bacteria and no decay took place, although oxygen and air were both freely admitted. It is well understood by the housewife that fruits can be kept indefinitely if they are cooked sufficiently to kill any bacteria present and then sealed in bacteria-free, air-tight jars. When such preserves spoil, it is because some bacteria were left in the jar or have since been admitted through an imperfect top. When decay is allowed to proceed, the obvious result is, first of all, a softening of the material, as in the case of a rotten apple, a liquefaction, as it is more technically known. Following that part of the process is a gradual breaking down of the material, the residue being of an earthy character which is assimilated by the soil into which it falls.

The bacteria required for the putrefaction of organic matter are among the most widely distributed of all the micro-organisms. They are always found in the air, except on mountain tops, in deserts, and over the ocean. They are very numerous in surface waters, such as streams and ponds, and their relative number everywhere increases as the amount of organic matter increases, so that the greater the need for them the greater is their number. It has been found that the great majority of these bacteria require air for their energetic development, and this fact is most important when it comes to the practical construction of a piece of apparatus for making use of these bacteria. It has also been found that, for several reasons, these bacteria work most effectively in the soil and can take care of a larger quantity of organic matter there than elsewhere. This is partly because in the surface layers of the soil, particularly where that soil has been cultivated, a great number of the particular bacteria involved in decay are always to be found. Pure, clean sand from the desert contains almost none of these beneficent bacteria. Rich garden soil is fairly teeming with them, so that, curiously, the more organic matter and the more bacteria present in any soil, the more active that soil will be in taking care of other organic matter.

Then, again, the soil particles, particularly in sandy soil, are so separated as to allow between them a certain and appreciable amount of air, and by means of this air the activity of the bacteria is made continuous and the products of their activity utilized. Without such an admission of air, the bacteria are choked and diminish rapidly in numbers. There is, however, a definite degree of purification and a certain quantity of organic matter which can be taken care of by the bacteria incident to any particular soil. Up to that quantity purification proceeds more or less satisfactorily according to the intelligence shown in feeding the bacteria in such a way as suits their convenience. If, however, that quantity be exceeded, all purification stops, the bacteria are apparently discouraged, and no further improvements can be expected. A fine-grained soil will not be so useful as a coarse-grained soil because the former does not allow sufficient air in the interstices of its soil particles. Another practical reason for not making use of soils of fine grains is that such soils can absorb only a small amount of liquid because of the mechanical construction of the material. On the other hand, soils whose grains are too coarse are undesirable because their mechanical construction is such that the liquids containing organic matter in solution pass through so rapidly that time enough is not given for bacterial action.