1109 ([return])
[ Possibly the division of this poem into two books is a division belonging solely to this ‘developed poem’, which may have included in its second part a summary of the Tale of Troy.]
1110 ([return])
[ Goettling’s explanation.]
1111 ([return])
[ x. 1. 52.]
1112 ([return])
[ Odysseus appears to have been mentioned once only—and that casually—in the Returns.]
1113 ([return])
[ M.M. Croiset note that the Aethiopis and the Sack were originally merely parts of one work containing lays (the Amazoneia, Aethiopis, Persis, etc.), just as the Iliad contained various lays such as the Diomedeia.]