The History of the Standard Oil Company

by Ida M. Tarbell

[87]. See Appendix, Number 38. Testimony of Henry M. Flagler in regard to the Tidewater contest.

[88]. Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County, Pennsylvania. Patterson vs. Tidewater Pipe Company, Limited. Testimony of E. G. Patterson, December, 1882.

[89]. See Appendix, Number 39 A. Agreement between Standard and Tidewater refineries.

See Appendix, Number 39 B. Agreement between Standard and Tidewater Pipe Lines.

[90]. See Appendix, Number 40. Two agreements of even date, August 22, 1884, between the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and the National Transit Company.

[91]. The Eighth Section of Article Second of this contract, defining the duties of the railroads reads: “To make manifests or way-bills of all petroleum or its products transported over any portion of the railroads of the party of the second part or its connections, which manifests shall state the name of the consignor, the place of shipment, the kind and actual quantity of the article shipped, the name of the consignee, and the place of destination, with the rate and gross amount of freight and charges, and to send daily to the principal office of the party of the first part duplicates of all such manifests or way-bills.”—Proceedings in Relation to Trusts, House of Representatives, 1888. Report Number 3,112, page 360.

[92]. Record of pleadings and testimony in Standard Oil Trust quo warranto cases in the Supreme Court of Ohio, 1899, page 681.

[93]. Trust Investigation of Ohio Senate, 1898, page 370.

[94]. Trust Investigation of Ohio Senate, 1898, page 370.

[95]. Trust Investigation of Ohio Senate, 1898, page 371.