[101]. See Chap V. [§ 10] end.
[102]. Sôṭâ, fol. 10. a.
[103]. See [Excursus B].
[104]. ‘Die andere culturhistorisch.’ I am obliged to render this convenient adjective by a circumlocution, as ‘civilisation-historical’ would be too cumbrous and hardly intelligible.—Tr.
[105]. I must refer those readers who are not sufficiently familiar with the terminology to Steinthal’s Abriss der Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin 1871, vol. I., where all this is fully discussed in the section Elementare psychische Processe.
[106]. But it is to be observed that some of the expressions produced by Polyonymy [multitude of names] survive the process of fusion and remain with the original signification; thus e.g. several names for Moon in Hebrew. On such names Synonymy, a secondary function of conscious speech, then performs its work.
[107]. Chips, First Series, pp. 356, 361.
[108]. On the Pronoun Wilhelm von Humboldt’s essay, Ueber die Verwandtschaft der Ortsadverbien mit dem Pronomen, Berlin 1830, still deserves study. See also what is said below (Chap. V. [§ 6]) on Âshêr.
[109]. Budenz, in the Hungarian review Magyar Nyelvőr (‘Guardian of the Hungarian Language’), 1875, IV. 57.
[110]. Max Müller, Chips, II. pp. 93–106.