[703]. Hosea XIV. 4 [3] must also be noted, where the alliance with Assyria is condemned in the words ‘Asshur will not save us; we shall not ride on horses.’ See also Zech. IX. 10, X. 5, Micah V. 9 [10].
[704]. See Ezek. XXXVII. 15–28.
[705]. See on the other side Zunz in the Zeitsch. d. D. M. G., 1873, p. 688, thesis 14 et seq.
[706]. These two passages (Mic. VI. 4 and Mal. III. 22 [IV. 4]) appears not to have been noticed by Michel Nicolas in his 'Etudes critiques sur la Bible,' Paris 1862, I. 351, where he says of Moses, ‘Son nom ne se trouve que deux fois dans les écrits des prophètes qui sont parvenus jusqu'à nous—(Esaie, LXIII. 12; Jér. XV. 1).’
[707]. I have given particular prominence to this on account of the opposite view taken by Max Müller in his Chips, I. 361 et seq.
[708]. His fondness for humanising God by anthropomorphic expressions is the only feature, the reasons for which are not patent.
[709]. See Knobel, Die Bücher Numeri, Deuteronomium und Josua, pp. 539, 554.
[710]. See Knobel, Die Bücher etc., p. 529.
[711]. The relative clause is dependent upon Debharîm only.
[712]. See Knobel, Die Bücher etc., p. 579.