| Districts. | Communities. |
|---|---|
| Ranenburg | 340 |
| Dankoff | 313 |
| Ostrogozhsk | 250 |
| Zadonsk | 197 |
| Korotoyak | 124 |
| Nizhnedevitsk | 161 |
| Total | 1385 |
[177] A sweeping criticism of the policy of the Russian government with regard to agriculture is to be found in Prof. Issaiew’s article, La Famine en Russie, in the Revue d’Economie Politique, 1892, No. 7. The apologists of the “historical friendship” pattern, should carefully read Chapter III.: Qu’est ce qui a été fait pour relever l’agriculture en Russie? One can there get the knowledge of some very conclusive facts which it is, of course, impossible to come across during a rapid trip through a vast country like Russia. The paper referred to should gain in authority by the fact that it was read before a meeting held at Emperor Alexander’s Lyceum of St. Petersburg, (to which only the sons of the highest dignitaries of the State or the offspring of the most aristocratic families are admitted,) and—last, not least—by the fact that it was published in France, which is now plus Tzariste que le Tzar.
| Loans granted. | Rubles. |
|---|---|
| By the nobility’s Crédit Foncier, to January 1, 1892 | 328,000,000 |
| By the Peasant’s Bank, to January 1, 1891 | 56,140,438 |
[179] “On small crédit foncier.” Otechstvenniya Zapiski (monthly), 1883.
[180] “The operations of the Peasant’s Crédit Foncier,” p. 105—Russkaya Mysl (monthly), February, 1892.
[181] Ibid., pp. 107, 108.
[182] In some of the gubernias failures were even more extensive:
| Percentage to the total in the gubernia. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gubernias. | Land forfeited. | Loans failed. |
| Penza | 39.34 | 48.80 |
| Poltava | 34.36 | 33.53 |
| Voronezh | 31.13 | 33.36 |
| Kursk | 25.22 | 30.81 |