Gamester and cheater were synonymous terms in the time of Shakspeare and Jonson: they have hardly lost much of their double signification in the present day.
The following is a curious picture of a gambling-house, from a contemporary account, and appears to be an establishment more systematic even than the "Hells" of the present day.
"A list of the officers established in the most notorious gaming-houses," from the Daily Journal, Jan. 9th, 1731.
1st. A Commissioner, always a proprietor, who looks in of a night; and the week's account is audited by him and two other proprietors.
2nd. A Director, who superintends the room.
3rd. An Operator, who deals the cards at a cheating game, called Faro.
4th. Two Crowpees, who watch the cards, and gather the money for the hank.
5th. Two Puffs, who have money given them to decoy others to play.
6th. A Clerk, who is a check upon the PUFFS, to see that they sink none of the money given them to play with.
7th. A Squib is a puff of lower rank, who serves at half-pay salary while he is learning to deal.
8th. A Flasher, to swear how often the bank has been stript.
9th. A Dunner, who goes about to recover money lost at play.
10th. A Waiter, to fill out wine, snuff candles, and attend the gaming-room.
11th. An Attorney, a Newgate solicitor.
12th. A Captain, who is to fight any gentleman who is peevish for losing his money.
13th. An Usher, who lights gentlemen up and down stairs, and gives the word to the porter.
14th. A Porter, who is generally a soldier of the Foot Guards.
15th. An Orderly Man, who walks up and down the outside of the door, to give notice to the porter, and alarm the house at the approach of the constable.
16th. A Runner, who is to get intelligence of the justices' meeting.
17th. Link-boys, Coachmen, Chairmen, or others who bring intelligence of the justices' meetings, or of the constables being out, at half-a-guinea reward.
18th. Common-bail, Affidavit-men, Ruffians, Bravoes, Assassins, cum multis aliis.
The "Memoirs of the most famous Gamesters from the reign of Charles II. to Queen Anne, by T. Lucas, Esq., 1714," appears to be a bookseller's job; but probably a few traditional stories are preserved.[58]
THE ARABIC CHRONICLE.
An Arabic chronicle is only valuable from the time of Mahomet. For such is the stupid superstition of the Arabs, that they pride themselves on being ignorant of whatever has passed before the mission of their Prophet. The Arabic chronicle of Jerusalem contains the most curious information concerning the crusades: Longuerue translated several portions of this chronicle, which appears to be written with impartiality. It renders justice to the Christian heroes, and particularly dwells on the gallant actions of the Count de St. Gilles.
Our historians chiefly write concerning Godfrey de Bouillon; only the learned know that the Count de St. Gilles acted there so important a character. The stories of the Saracens are just the reverse; they speak little concerning Godfrey, and eminently distinguish Saint Gilles.
Tasso has given in to the more vulgar accounts, by making the former so eminent, at the cost of the other heroes, in his Jerusalem Delivered. Thus Virgil transformed by his magical power the chaste Dido into a distracted lover; and Homer the meretricious Penelope into a moaning matron. It is not requisite for poets to be historians, but historians should not be so frequently poets. The same charge, I have been told, must be made against the Grecian historians. The Persians are viewed to great disadvantage in Grecian history. It would form a curious inquiry, and the result might be unexpected to some, were the Oriental student to comment on the Grecian historians. The Grecians were not the demi-gods they paint themselves to have been, nor those they attacked the contemptible multitudes they describe. These boasted victories might be diminished. The same observation attaches to Cæsar's account of his British expedition. He never records the defeats he frequently experienced. The national prejudices of the Roman historians have undoubtedly occasioned us to have a very erroneous conception of the Carthaginians, whose discoveries in navigation and commercial enterprises were the most considerable among the ancients. We must indeed think highly of that people, whose works on agriculture, which they had raised into a science, the senate of Rome ordered to be translated into Latin. They must indeed have been a wise and grave people.—Yet they are stigmatised by the Romans for faction, cruelty, and cowardice; and the "Punic" faith has come down to us in a proverb: but Livy was a Roman! and there is such a thing as a patriotic malignity!